Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence

Executive Order Number: 14110
President: Joseph R. Biden Jr.
Signed: October 30, 2023
Published: November 1, 2023
Source: Federal Register
Original Document: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-11-01/pdf/2023-24283.pdf

AI-Generated Summary

Executive Order 14110: Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence

Purpose

The purpose of Executive Order 14110 is to harness the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) while mitigating its risks. The order emphasizes responsible AI use to solve urgent challenges and enhance prosperity, productivity, innovation, and security, while preventing societal harms such as fraud, discrimination, bias, disinformation, and threats to national security. It calls for a society-wide effort involving government, private sector, academia, and civil society.

Key Actions and Directives

Establish guidelines and best practices for developing and deploying safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems, including generative AI and dual-use foundation models.
Promote responsible innovation and competition in AI through investments in education, training, research, and capacity building, while addressing intellectual property issues.
Support American workers by ensuring AI creates new jobs and industries, and by adapting job training and education to provide access to AI-created opportunities.
Advance equity and civil rights by ensuring AI complies with federal laws and by promoting evaluations, oversight, and regulation to prevent discrimination.
Protect consumers, patients, passengers, and students by enforcing consumer protection laws and implementing safeguards against AI-related harms in critical sectors.
Safeguard privacy and civil liberties by ensuring lawful and secure data practices and by using privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs).
Enhance federal government capacity in AI by attracting and retaining AI professionals and modernizing IT infrastructure.
Lead global efforts in AI development and governance by engaging with international allies and partners to manage risks and promote shared approaches.

Significant Changes to Policy or Law

The order mandates the development of guidelines for AI safety and security, including AI red-teaming tests and the creation of AI model evaluation tools and testbeds.
It introduces reporting requirements for companies developing or possessing dual-use foundation models and large-scale computing clusters.
It proposes regulations to require U.S. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Providers to report on foreign transactions involving AI training.
It calls for the development of a National Security Memorandum to address the governance of AI used in national security systems.

Potential Impacts

Government Agencies: Enhanced oversight and capacity to regulate and use AI responsibly, with new roles like Chief AI Officers and AI Governance Boards.
Citizens: Increased protection against AI-related harms such as discrimination, privacy violations, and consumer fraud, but also potential benefits from AI-driven advancements in various sectors.
International Relations: Strengthened U.S. leadership in global AI governance and potential for increased collaboration with international partners.

Main Stakeholders Affected

Federal Agencies: Departments of Commerce, Defense, Homeland Security, Energy, and others are tasked with implementing various directives.
Private Sector: Companies developing AI, particularly those involved with dual-use foundation models, will face new reporting and compliance requirements.
Academia and Research Institutions: Increased opportunities for AI research and education, with new initiatives like the National AI Research Resource (NAIRR).
Workers and Labor Unions: Emphasis on ensuring AI supports workers through job creation and adaptation of training programs.
Consumers and Civil Society: Greater protections and rights concerning AI use, with a focus on equity and civil rights.

Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

Legal: The order leverages existing laws and may lead to new regulations, particularly in areas like consumer protection and IaaS provider responsibilities. It also encourages independent regulatory agencies to consider their authorities in relation to AI.
Constitutional: The order does not directly address constitutional issues but emphasizes the protection of civil liberties and rights, which could intersect with constitutional considerations.
Political: The order reflects a proactive stance on AI governance, potentially influencing future legislative action and international policy discussions. It may also face scrutiny or opposition from those who prioritize AI innovation over regulation.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.