Regulatory Relief for Certain Stationary Sources To Promote American Coke Oven Processing Security
- Executive Order Number
- 14361
- President
- Donald Trump
- Signed
- November 20, 2025
- Published
- November 26, 2025
- Source
- Federal Register
- Original Document
- https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-11-26/pdf/2025-21417.pdf
AI-Generated Summary
Summary of Executive Order 14361
Purpose
The executive order modifies the scope of tariffs previously imposed on certain imports from Brazil under Executive Order 14323, which declared a national emergency due to threats posed by Brazilian government policies to U.S. national security, foreign policy, and economy. It aims to adjust these tariffs in light of ongoing negotiations with Brazil and updated assessments, specifically exempting certain agricultural products to address the emergency while supporting progress in talks.
Key Actions or Directives
- Updates Annex I of Executive Order 14323 to exclude specific agricultural products from the 40% additional ad valorem duty.
- Directs modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) as outlined in Annex II, effective for goods entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after 12:01 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on November 13, 2025.
- Authorizes refunds of duties collected where applicable, pursuant to U.S. Customs and Border Protection procedures.
- Instructs the Secretary of State to monitor the situation, consult with relevant officials, and inform the President of any need for further action.
- Empowers the Secretary of State, in consultation with other specified officials, to implement the order using powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and other laws.
Significant Changes to Policy or Law
- Narrows the application of the 40% tariff by exempting certain agricultural imports from Brazil, based on initial negotiation progress and recommendations from U.S. officials.
- Adjusts the HTS to reflect these exemptions, potentially reducing trade barriers for specified goods while maintaining tariffs on others.
- Reinforces the national emergency framework from Executive Order 14323 but introduces flexibility in response to diplomatic developments.
Potential Impacts
- On Government Agencies: Requires coordination among departments like State, Treasury, Commerce, Homeland Security, and others to implement tariff changes and monitor compliance; may involve processing duty refunds.
- On Citizens: Could lower costs for U.S. consumers and businesses reliant on Brazilian agricultural imports, potentially stabilizing prices in related sectors.
- On International Relations: Supports ongoing negotiations with Brazil, signaling U.S. willingness to adjust measures based on progress, which may improve bilateral ties and encourage further dialogue on the underlying threats.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- U.S. Importers and Businesses: Particularly those in agriculture, benefiting from tariff exemptions on specified Brazilian goods.
- Brazilian Government and Exporters: Gains relief on agricultural exports, potentially aiding their economy and facilitating negotiations.
- U.S. Government Agencies: Including the Departments of State, Treasury, Commerce, Homeland Security, and the U.S. Trade Representative, responsible for implementation and monitoring.
- U.S. Consumers and Industries: Indirectly affected through potential changes in supply chains, prices, and availability of agricultural products.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: Relies on IEEPA and related statutes for tariff modifications, ensuring consistency with trade laws; may face challenges if perceived as arbitrary, but is grounded in the declared national emergency.
- Constitutional: Exercises presidential authority over foreign affairs and trade, aligning with Article II powers, though it could invite congressional scrutiny under the separation of powers.
- Political: Reflects a pragmatic approach to trade policy amid international tensions, potentially influencing domestic politics on trade protectionism versus diplomacy; exemptions may appease agricultural interests while maintaining pressure on Brazil for broader policy changes.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.