Designation of Certain Muslim Brotherhood Chapters as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists

Executive Order Number: 14362
President: Donald Trump
Signed: November 24, 2025
Published: November 28, 2025
Source: Federal Register
Original Document: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-11-28/pdf/2025-21664.pdf

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose

The executive order initiates a process to evaluate and potentially designate specific chapters or subdivisions of the Muslim Brotherhood—particularly those in Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt—as Foreign Terrorist Organizations under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and as specially designated global terrorists under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and Executive Order 13224. It highlights the organization's transnational network and its alleged involvement in violence, destabilization, and support for attacks that threaten U.S. citizens, interests, and regional partners, including actions following the October 7, 2023, attack in Israel.

Key Actions or Directives

Report Submission: Within 30 days, the Secretary of State and Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and Director of National Intelligence, must submit a joint report to the President recommending designations for Muslim Brotherhood chapters in Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, and potentially others.
Designation Actions: Within 45 days of the report, the relevant secretaries shall take appropriate steps to designate qualifying chapters as foreign terrorist organizations or specially designated global terrorists, consistent with applicable laws.
Policy Implementation: The U.S. will cooperate with regional partners to eliminate the capabilities and resources of designated chapters, aiming to neutralize threats to U.S. nationals and national security.

Significant Changes to Policy or Law

Introduces a formal, expedited process for designating Muslim Brotherhood entities as terrorists, building on existing frameworks like INA Section 219 and IEEPA without creating new laws.
Shifts U.S. policy toward explicitly targeting Muslim Brotherhood chapters for their alleged support of violence and terrorism, potentially expanding the scope of entities subject to sanctions, asset freezes, and immigration restrictions under Executive Order 13224.
No direct changes to statutes, but mandates interagency coordination and action timelines that could lead to broader counterterrorism designations.

Potential Impacts

Government Agencies: Requires coordinated efforts from the Departments of State and Treasury, involving consultations with Justice and Intelligence; may increase workload and resource allocation for terrorism designations and enforcement.
Citizens: Could affect U.S. nationals by enhancing security measures against perceived threats in the Middle East, potentially restricting travel, financial transactions, or associations with designated entities; may impact civil liberties if designations lead to broader surveillance or restrictions.
International Relations: Strengthens cooperation with regional partners (e.g., Israel, Jordan) to counter designated groups, but risks straining ties with countries where the Muslim Brotherhood operates legally or has political influence (e.g., Egypt, Jordan); could escalate tensions in the Middle East by formalizing U.S. opposition to the organization.

Main Stakeholders Affected

U.S. Government Entities: Departments of State, Treasury, Justice, and Intelligence Community, responsible for reporting and designations.
Muslim Brotherhood Chapters: Specifically those in Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, and potentially others, facing possible sanctions, asset freezes, and operational restrictions.
Regional Partners: Countries like Israel, affected by the group's activities, and allies in the Middle East cooperating on counterterrorism.
U.S. Citizens and Interests: Individuals in the Levant or Middle East, as well as broader U.S. foreign policy and security apparatus.
International Community: Nations hosting Muslim Brotherhood affiliates, potentially impacted by U.S. sanctions or diplomatic pressures.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

Legal: Relies on established authorities under INA and IEEPA, ensuring designations follow due process (e.g., evidence-based criteria in 8 U.S.C. 1189); includes disclaimers that the order creates no enforceable rights, protecting against legal challenges.
Constitutional: Invokes presidential authority under the Constitution and statutes, aligning with executive powers in foreign affairs and national security; could raise First Amendment concerns if designations inadvertently affect free association or speech related to non-violent Brotherhood activities.
Political: Represents a targeted counterterrorism stance against a specific Islamist organization, potentially polarizing domestically and internationally; may influence U.S. foreign policy debates on terrorism designations, especially given the Brotherhood's varying roles as political vs. militant entities in different countries.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.