A bill to require the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy on intelligence coordination and sharing relating to critical and emerging technologies.
- Bill Number
- S. 3288
- Origin Chamber
- Senate
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Armed Forces and National Security
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-12-01: Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
- Last Updated
- 2026-04-09T20:27:16Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose of the Legislation
This bill aims to enhance the U.S. intelligence community's ability to handle information on critical and emerging technologies (such as advanced computing, biotechnology, or artificial intelligence) by requiring a formal strategy for coordinating and sharing foreign intelligence. The goal is to better support national security, innovation, and regulatory efforts in these fast-evolving areas.
Key Provisions
- Definitions:
- "Congressional intelligence committees" refer to specific Senate and House committees that oversee intelligence activities.
- "Intelligence community" includes 18 U.S. agencies and organizations involved in national security intelligence, as defined in the National Security Act of 1947.
- Development of Strategy: Within 60 days of the bill becoming law, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) must create a strategy that:
- Coordinates the collection, processing, analysis, and sharing of foreign intelligence (information gathered from outside the U.S.) related to critical and emerging technologies across the intelligence community.
- Ensures appropriate sharing of this intelligence with other federal departments and agencies responsible for areas like regulation, innovation and research, science, public health, export controls (rules on selling sensitive tech abroad), screenings (reviews of foreign investments or tech transfers), and federal financial tools (such as funding or sanctions).
- Reporting Requirement: Within 30 days of completing the strategy, the DNI must submit it to the congressional intelligence committees.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This bill introduces a new mandate not previously specified in law. It builds on the National Security Act of 1947 by adding a targeted requirement for a strategy focused on critical and emerging technologies, which were not explicitly addressed in prior intelligence coordination frameworks. No existing laws are directly amended or repealed; instead, it creates an additional obligation for the DNI.
Potential Impacts
- On Government Agencies: The intelligence community and agencies like the Departments of Commerce, Health and Human Services, and Treasury could benefit from more streamlined intelligence sharing, leading to faster decision-making on tech regulations, export policies, and research funding. This might reduce silos (isolated operations) and improve responses to global tech threats.
- On Citizens: Indirectly, it could enhance national security by better protecting against foreign tech espionage or misuse, potentially safeguarding jobs, health innovations, and economic competitiveness. However, it does not directly affect individual rights or daily life.
- On International Relations: Strengthens U.S. positioning in global tech competitions (e.g., with China or Russia) by improving intelligence on foreign advancements, which could influence trade, alliances, and sanctions without altering diplomatic structures.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Intelligence Community and DNI: Directly responsible for developing and implementing the strategy.
- Federal Agencies: Including those handling exports (e.g., Commerce Department), health (e.g., HHS), and finance (e.g., Treasury), which will receive shared intelligence to inform their work.
- Congressional Intelligence Committees: Gain oversight through the required report, allowing them to monitor and guide intelligence efforts.
- Broader U.S. Tech Sector: Indirectly impacted through better-informed policies on innovation and security, though private companies are not directly regulated by this bill.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: Reinforces the DNI's role under the National Security Act without expanding surveillance powers; focuses on coordination rather than new authorities. It promotes transparency via congressional reporting, aligning with oversight requirements in intelligence law.
- Constitutional: Supports the executive branch's foreign affairs powers (Article II) while ensuring legislative checks (Article I), maintaining balance in national security matters. No direct privacy or civil liberties issues are raised, as it pertains to foreign intelligence.
- Political: Could signal bipartisan concern over tech threats amid U.S.-China tensions, potentially influencing future budgets or tech policy debates. As an introduced bill (not yet passed), it highlights priorities for the 119th Congress but carries no immediate enforcement until enacted.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Recent Actions
- 2025-12-01: Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
- 2025-12-01: Introduced in Senate
Bill Versions
- To require the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy on intelligence coordination and sharing relating to critical and emerging technologies. — issued 2025-12-01 — PDF (2 pages)