Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7007) to govern on behalf of the American people.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 986
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 2
- Policy Area
- Congress
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2026-01-12: Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
- Last Updated
- 2026-03-17T15:55:29Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
H. Res. 986 is a procedural resolution that establishes special rules for the House of Representatives to consider and vote on H.R. 7007, a bill titled "to govern on behalf of the American people." Its main goal is to expedite the debate and passage of H.R. 7007 by waiving certain standard House procedures, allowing for a streamlined process.
Key Provisions
- Immediate Consideration: Upon adoption of the resolution, the House must immediately begin debating H.R. 7007, with all objections (points of order) to starting the process waived.
- Amendments: A substitute amendment (a full replacement version of the bill) submitted by the ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules—at least one day in advance and printed in the Congressional Record—will be automatically adopted. If multiple such amendments are submitted, only the most recent one applies.
- Reading and Objections: The amended bill is treated as already read aloud, and all objections to its specific provisions are waived.
- Debate and Voting Limits: Debate is restricted to one hour, split equally between the majority leader and minority leader (or their designees). After debate, the bill moves directly to a final vote without additional amendments or delays, except for one allowed motion to recommit (a procedural step where the bill can be sent back to committee for changes).
- Suspension of House Rules: Certain standard rules are suspended for this bill:
- Clause 1(c) of Rule XIX (which limits motions to recommit with instructions during debate).
- Clause 8 of Rule XX (which deals with the order of business and voting on the calendar).
- Transmission to Senate: The House Clerk must notify the Senate of the bill's passage within three calendar days.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This resolution does not amend substantive laws but temporarily alters House procedural rules for handling H.R. 7007. Key changes include:
- Waiving points of order, which normally allow members to challenge bills for violating budget, ethics, or other rules.
- Limiting amendments to only one pre-approved substitute, restricting broader changes.
- Shortening debate from potentially unlimited time to just one hour and blocking most intervening motions, which speeds up the process compared to standard House rules that allow more flexibility.
These procedural tweaks apply only to this specific bill and do not permanently change House rules or U.S. law.
Potential Impacts
- On Government Agencies: Minimal direct impact, as this is procedural; however, if H.R. 7007 passes and becomes law, it could affect agencies depending on the bill's content (not detailed here).
- On Citizens: Indirect effects through faster passage of H.R. 7007, potentially leading to quicker implementation of its policies on governance, though the bill's specifics are not provided.
- On International Relations: No apparent impact, as the resolution focuses on domestic House procedures.
- Overall, it enables rapid House action on H.R. 7007, reducing opportunities for extended scrutiny but increasing the likelihood of swift legislative progress.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- House Members and Leadership: Majority and minority leaders control debate time; rank-and-file members have limited amendment opportunities, potentially frustrating those seeking changes.
- Committee on Rules: Its ranking minority member can submit the key amendment, giving them influence.
- Broader Congress and Public: Affects the Senate's timeline for receiving the bill; citizens may be impacted if H.R. 7007 enacts governance-related policies.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal/Constitutional: Aligns with the House's constitutional authority (Article I) to set its own rules, but the waivers could raise questions about fairness in legislative process, though such resolutions are common and generally upheld.
- Political: By limiting debate and amendments, it favors the majority party, potentially seen as a tool to bypass opposition. This could heighten partisan tensions but is a standard tactic for priority bills. No direct constitutional challenges are evident from the text.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]
Recent Actions
- 2026-01-12: Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
- 2026-01-12: Submitted in House
- 2026-01-12: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7007) to govern on behalf of the American people. — issued 2026-01-12 — PDF (2 pages)