Condemning antisemitism in all its forms, including the proliferation and amplification of antisemitic content on artificial intelligence (AI) platforms, urging robust, transparent safeguards for AI, and recognizing stakeholders working to counter this threat.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 963
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Science, Technology, Communications
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-12-18: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Last Updated
- 2026-01-21T09:05:26Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
This House Resolution (H. Res. 963) condemns antisemitism—a form of prejudice, discrimination, or hostility against Jewish people—in all its forms. It specifically addresses how antisemitic content spreads and amplifies on artificial intelligence (AI) platforms, such as chatbots or image generators. The resolution calls for strong, open safeguards in AI to prevent this, and it recognizes efforts by various groups to fight this issue. Overall, it aims to promote American values like unity and safety by treating the fight against antisemitism as a national priority.
Key Provisions
The resolution includes a series of "whereas" clauses explaining the problem (e.g., AI's role in spreading hate, historical examples like Microsoft's Tay in 2016 or recent issues with Grok AI) and ends with nine resolved actions by the House of Representatives:
- Condemnation of antisemitism: Declares it opposes U.S. constitutional values, especially when spread via AI and social media.
- Responsibility for tech companies: Urges AI developers to add safeguards like transparency, expert consultations, and controls to stop amplification of hate, harassment, or violence calls.
- Standards and tools: Encourages creating guidelines, testing methods (e.g., "red teaming" or simulating attacks to find weaknesses), and datasets to identify and reduce AI risks related to antisemitism and hate.
- Data and research support: Calls for better sharing of data, researcher access, and privacy-safe ways to study and improve responses to antisemitic content on AI platforms.
- Education and awareness: Supports programs, especially for young people, to build skills in spotting and reporting AI-generated antisemitic material, including digital literacy and Holocaust education.
- Collaboration: Promotes partnerships between governments, civil society, schools, and industry to test anti-hate strategies and handle threats.
- Reporting requirements: Urges AI platforms to regularly report publicly on antisemitic content trends, removal success, and safety changes using standard metrics.
- Constitutional protections: Stresses that anti-antisemitism measures must respect free speech, privacy, fair processes, and avoid unfair targeting.
- Call to action: Encourages all involved parties to protect Jewish safety and ensure AI innovation supports human rights and democracy.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This is a resolution, not a law, so it introduces no binding changes or new legal requirements. It builds on existing voluntary commitments by tech companies (e.g., statements from Microsoft and Google) and U.S. policies promoting safe AI, but it has no enforcement power. Instead, it serves as a formal statement to guide future voluntary actions and potential legislation.
Potential Impacts
- On government agencies: May encourage federal bodies like the Department of Justice or Commerce to prioritize AI safety in oversight, data sharing, and partnerships, potentially leading to non-binding guidelines or funding for research.
- On citizens: Raises awareness for Jewish communities facing online threats, empowers users (especially youth) through education to combat hate, and promotes safer online spaces for all, reducing risks of harassment or violence incitement.
- On international relations: Highlights U.S. leadership in ethical AI, potentially influencing global standards and collaborations with allies on countering hate, while affirming opposition to antisemitism as a shared democratic value.
- Broader effects include pressuring tech firms to improve AI ethics voluntarily, fostering innovation in anti-bias tools, and supporting evidence-based policies without mandating costs.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Jewish individuals and communities: Primary beneficiaries, as the resolution aims to protect them from AI-amplified hate and promote their safety and dignity.
- AI and tech companies (e.g., developers of models like Grok or large language systems): Urged to adopt safeguards, reporting, and collaborations, facing reputational pressure if they fail.
- Civil society, academia, and faith-based groups: Recognized for their research and warnings; encouraged to partner in standards development and education.
- Government entities: Federal, state, and local levels, plus educators, to collaborate on interventions, literacy programs, and crisis responses.
- General public and youth: Impacted through awareness initiatives to recognize and resist antisemitic content in daily digital life.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: Non-binding, so no direct court challenges, but it reinforces existing laws against hate crimes (e.g., under civil rights statutes) and could inspire enforceable regulations on AI transparency without creating new obligations.
- Constitutional: Explicitly ties anti-antisemitism efforts to core U.S. values like free speech and equal protection under the First and Fourteenth Amendments; emphasizes balancing hate prevention with civil liberties to avoid overreach, such as broad censorship.
- Political: Bipartisan support (introduced by Democrats and Republicans) signals broad congressional consensus, potentially boosting momentum for related bills on AI ethics or online safety. It positions the U.S. as proactive on emerging tech threats, but critics might view it as symbolic without teeth, highlighting tensions between innovation and regulation.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Cosponsors (29)
Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2], Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6], Rep. Friedman, Laura [D-CA-30], Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-12], Rep. Ansari, Yassamin [D-AZ-3], Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10], Rep. Salazar, Maria Elvira [R-FL-27], Rep. Latimer, George [D-NY-16], Rep. Moskowitz, Jared [D-FL-23], Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26], Rep. Balint, Becca [D-VT-At Large], Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1], Rep. Veasey, Marc A. [D-TX-33], Rep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-IL-10], Rep. Panetta, Jimmy [D-CA-19], Rep. Peters, Scott H. [D-CA-50], Rep. Magaziner, Seth [D-RI-2], Rep. Dean, Madeleine [D-PA-4], Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9], Rep. Vargas, Juan [D-CA-52], Rep. Bell, Wesley [D-MO-1], Rep. Stanton, Greg [D-AZ-4], Rep. Carbajal, Salud O. [D-CA-24], Rep. Suozzi, Thomas R. [D-NY-3], Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21], Rep. Sherman, Brad [D-CA-32], Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17], Rep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8], Rep. McBride, Sarah [D-DE-At Large]
Recent Actions
- 2025-12-18: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-12-18: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-12-18: Submitted in House
- 2025-12-18: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Condemning antisemitism in all its forms, including the proliferation and amplification of antisemitic content on artificial intelligence (AI) platforms, urging robust, transparent safeguards for AI, and recognizing stakeholders working to counter this threat. — issued 2025-12-18 — PDF (6 pages)