Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States for high crimes and misdemeanors.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 939
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Government Operations and Politics
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-12-11: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Last Updated
- 2026-04-09T14:45:47Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
This resolution (H. Res. 939) aims to impeach Donald John Trump, as President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. It accuses him of abusing presidential power in ways that threaten democracy, incite violence, and violate his constitutional oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. The resolution seeks to exhibit articles of impeachment to the Senate for a trial, potentially leading to his removal from office.
Key Provisions
The resolution includes two main articles of impeachment, each detailing specific alleged abuses:
- Article I: Abuse of Presidential Power by Calling for the Execution of Members of Congress
- Accuses Trump of violating his oath and duty to enforce laws by threatening six Democratic lawmakers (current or former members of the Senate or House, with military or intelligence backgrounds) with execution.
- This stemmed from a November 18, 2025, video by the lawmakers urging military and intelligence personnel to refuse illegal orders and uphold the Constitution.
- On November 20, 2025, Trump allegedly responded via social media posts labeling their actions as "seditious behavior" punishable by death, calling for their arrest and trial, and reposting calls to "hang them" in the style of George Washington.
- Describes this as promoting extra-judicial punishment and assassination, warranting impeachment.
- Article II: Abuse of Presidential Power to Intimidate Federal Judges in Violation of the Separation of Powers and Independence of the Judiciary
- Accuses Trump of violating his oath by threatening federal judges, fostering a climate of violence, and undermining judicial independence (the principle that courts operate free from executive or legislative interference).
- Cites examples like Trump's social media attacks on a district judge (appointed by Obama) for a ruling he disliked, calling for the judge's impeachment.
- Notes increased threats to judges after Trump's rhetoric, including reports from a U.S. District Chief Judge and Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who in May 2025 described such attacks as intentional intimidation risking democracy and the rule of law.
- Argues this disregards Article III of the Constitution, which grants courts authority over cases involving the Constitution, laws, and treaties, and disrupts the balance of powers among government branches.
- States that these actions endanger judges, court staff, and bystanders, incite hate, and subvert constitutional government.
The resolution concludes that these actions justify impeachment, trial, and removal from office.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This resolution does not amend or create new laws. Instead, it invokes the existing impeachment process under Article II, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which allows Congress to impeach and remove the president for "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." It introduces no statutory changes but applies this constitutional mechanism to specific alleged conduct.
Potential Impacts
- On Government Agencies: Could lead to a Senate trial, distracting from executive functions and straining resources in the Justice Department, military, and intelligence communities if investigations or protections are needed for targeted officials.
- On Citizens: May heighten political tensions, increase risks of violence or threats against public officials, and erode trust in democratic institutions if perceived as partisan. It could also encourage or deter free speech and dissent among lawmakers and judges.
- On International Relations: Trump's removal (if successful) might signal U.S. commitment to the rule of law abroad but could portray internal instability, affecting alliances or perceptions of U.S. leadership. No direct international provisions are included.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- President Donald John Trump: Directly targeted for impeachment and potential removal.
- Democratic Lawmakers: Six specific members (serving in Congress with military/intelligence ties) threatened with execution, facing heightened personal risks.
- Federal Judiciary: Judges and Supreme Court justices endangered by threats, with broader impacts on court operations and independence.
- Congress: House initiates the process; Senate would conduct the trial, affecting partisan dynamics.
- Military and Intelligence Communities: Indirectly involved via the lawmakers' video urging adherence to constitutional oaths.
- The Public: All U.S. citizens, as the resolution claims threats to democracy, the rule of law, and national stability.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal Implications: Establishes a precedent for impeaching based on social media rhetoric as abuse of power, potentially expanding interpretations of "high crimes and misdemeanors" beyond traditional crimes to include threats that incite violence or undermine institutions. Could prompt legal challenges over free speech protections under the First Amendment.
- Constitutional Implications: Highlights tensions in the separation of powers (executive vs. judicial branches) and the president's oath (Article II), emphasizing the impeachment process as a check on executive overreach. Raises questions about protecting elected officials and judges from intimidation without infringing on political discourse.
- Political Implications: Likely to deepen partisan divides, as it originates from a Democratic representative (Mr. Green of Texas) and targets a Republican president. If advanced, it could influence midterm elections, public opinion on leadership, and future norms around presidential conduct in a polarized environment. The resolution's referral to the House Judiciary Committee suggests initial debate on its viability.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Cosponsors (2)
Rep. Carson, André [D-IN-7], Rep. Williams, Nikema [D-GA-5]
Recent Actions
- 2025-12-11: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2025-12-11: On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - 140, 47 Present (Roll no. 322). (Roll call 322)
- 2025-12-11: Mr. Scalise moved to table the measure.
- 2025-12-11: Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H5787-5789; text: CR H5787-5788)
- 2025-12-11: QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE - Mr. Green (TX) rose to a question of the privileges of the House and offered the resolution. The Chair directed the Clerk to report the resolution. Upon examination of the resolution, the Chair determined that the resolution did constitute a question of the privileges of the House.
- 2025-12-10: NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Mr. Green (TX) notified the House of his intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.
- 2025-12-10: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2025-12-10: Submitted in House
- 2025-12-10: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States for high crimes and misdemeanors. — issued 2025-12-10 — PDF (7 pages)