Condemning the recent attacks on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection Law Enforcement personnel and facilities.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 881
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Immigration
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-11-17: Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Last Updated
- 2025-11-19T13:02:59Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose of the Legislation
H. Res. 881 is a non-binding resolution introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on November 17, 2025, aimed at condemning recent violent attacks on personnel and facilities of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). It highlights the agencies' roles in national security and public safety while expressing gratitude and recognition for their service.
Key Provisions
The resolution includes a series of "Whereas" clauses that outline the missions of ICE and CBP, describe specific incidents of violence, and note a sharp rise in assaults and threats. These incidents, occurring between July and November 2025 in locations like Texas, Oklahoma, California, and Illinois, involve shootings, assaults, bomb threats, and ambushes targeting officers, agents, detainees, and facilities.
The core "Resolved" section directs the House to:
- Strongly condemn any act of violence against ICE and CBP personnel, facilities, and detainees.
- Thank the personnel for their dedication to protecting communities and the nation.
- Honor their courage and service in defending the United States and upholding their oath.
The resolution was referred to the Committees on Homeland Security, Judiciary, and Ways and Means for review.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This is a resolution, not a bill, so it introduces no changes to existing laws or statutes. It serves as an official expression of the House's position without legal force or enforceable requirements.
Potential Impacts
- On government agencies: Provides symbolic support to ICE and CBP, potentially boosting morale amid reported increases in assaults (1,000% for ICE personnel) and death threats (8,000% for ICE officers), as cited by the Department of Homeland Security. It may encourage heightened security measures but does not allocate resources.
- On citizens: Raises public awareness of risks faced by federal law enforcement in immigration enforcement, possibly influencing perceptions of border security and immigration policy.
- On international relations: Minimal direct impact, though it underscores U.S. commitment to combating transnational threats like terrorism and gang activity mentioned in the agencies' missions.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- ICE and CBP personnel and facilities: Directly honored and protected through condemnation of attacks.
- Department of Homeland Security (DHS): Oversees both agencies; the resolution references DHS data on rising threats.
- Detainees and immigrants: Incidents involving injuries or deaths to detainees are highlighted, affecting those in custody.
- Assailants and communities: Includes references to attackers like transnational gang members; local communities in border or urban areas (e.g., Texas, Chicago) may see indirect effects on law enforcement interactions.
- Congress and the public: Represents a congressional stance that could shape broader policy debates on immigration enforcement.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: As a simple House resolution (H. Res.), it has no binding effect and does not require Senate approval or presidential signature, limiting it to an internal House statement.
- Constitutional: Aligns with Congress's oversight role over federal agencies under Article I, but raises no direct constitutional challenges. It emphasizes protection of federal officers, tying into broader First Amendment considerations around protests versus violence.
- Political: Signals strong bipartisan or partisan support for immigration enforcement amid heightened tensions, potentially fueling debates on border security, resource allocation for law enforcement, and responses to anti-enforcement activism. The detailed incident list may highlight regional concerns in Republican-led districts.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Recent Actions
- 2025-11-17: Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-11-17: Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-11-17: Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-11-17: Submitted in House
- 2025-11-17: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Condemning the recent attacks on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection Law Enforcement personnel and facilities. — issued 2025-11-17 — PDF (4 pages)