Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that violent attacks against United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities and officers are unacceptable, must be fully condemned, and that Congress stands in support of ICE's mission to protect national security, public safety, and the enforcement of immigration laws.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 767
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Immigration
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-09-26: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Last Updated
- 2025-10-09T08:05:29Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose of the Legislation
This resolution (H. Res. 767) expresses the House of Representatives' strong disapproval of violent attacks on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities, personnel, and detainees. It condemns such violence and affirms congressional support for ICE's role in safeguarding national security, public safety, and immigration law enforcement.
Key Provisions Outlined
The resolution includes a series of "Whereas" clauses detailing recent incidents of violence against ICE (e.g., shootings, riots, and threats from June to September 2025) and highlighting ICE's critical work, such as protecting unaccompanied migrant children and targeting criminal offenders. The core "Resolved" section outlines four main actions:
- Condemnation of violence: Unequivocally denounces recent attacks, threats, and resulting deaths or injuries.
- Support for ICE personnel: Reaffirms backing for ICE agents, officers, and staff under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), recognizing their dangerous duties.
- Calls for action: Urges DHS, ICE, the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Department of State, and law enforcement at all levels to investigate incidents, enhance prevention through better coordination, training, equipment, and countermeasures against online threats like doxxing (publicly sharing private information to harass individuals).
- Promotion of responsible discourse: Encourages public officials and media to avoid inflammatory rhetoric against ICE or law enforcement and to promote lawful enforcement.
Significant Changes to Existing Law Introduced
This is a non-binding resolution expressing the House's opinion, so it introduces no changes to existing laws or statutes. It does not create new legal requirements, penalties, or funding but serves as a formal statement of position.
Potential Impacts
- On government agencies: Could boost morale and resources for ICE and DHS by signaling political support, potentially leading to improved security measures or inter-agency collaboration without mandating them.
- On citizens: Reinforces public trust in immigration enforcement by condemning violence, but may heighten debates on immigration policy; it highlights risks to detainees and officers, indirectly affecting communities near ICE facilities.
- On international relations: Minimal direct impact, though it underscores U.S. commitment to immigration enforcement, which could influence perceptions of border security in dealings with other countries on migration issues.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- ICE personnel and DHS: Directly supported and protected through condemnation of attacks and calls for enhanced safety.
- Law enforcement partners (federal, state, local): Encouraged to collaborate on investigations and prevention.
- Public officials and media: Urged to moderate rhetoric to avoid inciting violence.
- Immigrant communities and detainees: Acknowledged in contexts of protection (e.g., unaccompanied children) but potentially affected by emphasized enforcement priorities.
- Perpetrators and protesters: Faces implicit calls for accountability through investigations.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: As a "sense of the House" resolution, it has no enforceable effect but can influence future legislation or executive actions on immigration and officer safety.
- Constitutional: Aligns with Congress's oversight role over federal agencies (under Article I) and free speech protections, while urging responsible public discourse without restricting it.
- Political: Represents partisan support for stricter immigration enforcement (referencing Trump administration achievements), potentially escalating debates on border policies, officer protection, and protest rights amid rising tensions; it was introduced by Republican members and referred to key committees for review.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Cosponsors (4)
Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11], Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25], Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17], Rep. Hunt, Wesley [R-TX-38]
Recent Actions
- 2025-09-26: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-09-26: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-09-26: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-09-26: Submitted in House
- 2025-09-26: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that violent attacks against United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities and officers are unacceptable, must be fully condemned, and that Congress stands in support of ICE’s mission to protect national security, public safety, and the enforcement of immigration laws. — issued 2025-09-26 — PDF (5 pages)