Affirming the alliance between the United States and the Republic of Korea.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 64
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- International Affairs
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2026-05-13: Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 3.
- Last Updated
- 2026-07-07T13:54:02Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
This House Resolution (H. Res. 64) aims to affirm and celebrate the strong alliance between the United States and the Republic of Korea (South Korea). It emphasizes shared values like democracy and human rights, historical ties, security cooperation, economic partnerships, and the contributions of Korean Americans. The resolution serves as a symbolic statement of support, marking milestones such as the 80th anniversary of Korean liberation from colonial rule in 2025.
Key Provisions
The resolution includes a series of "Whereas" clauses providing historical and factual background, followed by a "Resolved" section with five main affirmations:
- Reaffirmation of the alliance: Recognizes the enduring importance of the U.S.-South Korea partnership.
- Security role: Highlights the alliance's critical role in promoting peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.
- Strengthening ties: Calls for continued enhancement of security, economic, and cultural relations.
- Celebration of Korean Americans: Acknowledges the contributions of over 2 million Korean Americans to U.S. society, economy, and military service.
- Support for cultural events: Endorses the goals of Korean Culture-Kimchi Day, promoting cultural exchange.
It references key historical events (e.g., 1882 treaty, 1953 Mutual Defense Treaty), economic data (e.g., $91.3 billion in U.S. exports to South Korea in 2023), and prior laws like the 2018 Asia Reassurance Initiative Act, which commits to the alliance.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This is a non-binding resolution, not a law, so it introduces no changes to existing statutes or policies. It reinforces commitments from prior agreements, such as the Mutual Defense Treaty and the Nuclear Consultative Group (launched in 2023 for nuclear deterrence planning), but does not alter legal frameworks.
Potential Impacts
- On government agencies: Encourages the U.S. Department of State and Department of Defense to prioritize alliance-building, potentially influencing foreign aid, military exercises, and diplomatic efforts in the Indo-Pacific.
- On citizens: Boosts cultural awareness and pride among Korean Americans; may indirectly support economic opportunities through highlighted trade and investment (e.g., South Korean firms employing over 88,000 U.S. workers).
- On international relations: Signals strong U.S. commitment to South Korea, deterring regional threats (e.g., from North Korea) and fostering a "free and open Indo-Pacific." It could enhance bilateral cooperation on global issues like supply chains and security without creating new obligations.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- U.S. and South Korean governments: Primary beneficiaries through reaffirmed diplomatic and security ties.
- Korean American community: Directly celebrated for their role in bridging the two nations and contributing to U.S. society.
- Businesses and investors: U.S. and South Korean companies involved in trade (e.g., seventh-largest trading partner in 2023) and foreign direct investment (e.g., $76.7 billion from South Korea to the U.S.).
- Military personnel: U.S. forces on the Korean Peninsula (continuous presence since 1953) and Korean American service members.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: As a simple resolution passed only by the House, it has no force of law and requires no presidential approval. It aligns with constitutional powers under Article I for Congress to express foreign policy views but does not bind the executive branch.
- Constitutional: Supports the Senate's treaty-making role (Article II) by referencing existing treaties without proposing new ones.
- Political: Demonstrates congressional consensus on the alliance's value amid geopolitical tensions in Asia, potentially influencing future appropriations or negotiations. It promotes soft power through cultural recognition, avoiding controversy by focusing on positive, bipartisan themes.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Rep. Suozzi, Thomas R. [D-NY-3]
Cosponsors (68)
Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6], Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1], Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5], Rep. Moulton, Seth [D-MA-6], Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5], Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2], Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7], Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1], Rep. Wilson, Joe [R-SC-2], Del. Moylan, James C. [R-GU-At Large], Rep. Beyer, Donald S. [D-VA-8], Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10], Rep. Carson, André [D-IN-7], Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5], Rep. Kelly, Mike [R-PA-16], Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-6], Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40], Rep. Valadao, David G. [R-CA-22], Rep. Veasey, Marc A. [D-TX-33], Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24], Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6], Rep. Zinke, Ryan K. [R-MT-1], Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47], Rep. Mackenzie, Ryan [R-PA-7], Rep. Kiggans, Jennifer A. [R-VA-2], Rep. Lieu, Ted [D-CA-36], Rep. Carbajal, Salud O. [D-CA-24], Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11], Rep. Strickland, Marilyn [D-WA-10], Rep. Davis, Donald G. [D-NC-1], Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11], Rep. Gillen, Laura [D-NY-4], Rep. Peters, Scott H. [D-CA-50], Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6], Rep. Morelle, Joseph D. [D-NY-25], Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8], Rep. Panetta, Jimmy [D-CA-19], Rep. Harder, Josh [D-CA-9], Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-14], Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11], Rep. Sherman, Brad [D-CA-32], Rep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-IL-10], Rep. Lee, Susie [D-NV-3], Rep. Hurd, Jeff [R-CO-3], Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21], Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20], Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2], Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1], Rep. DelBene, Suzan K. [D-WA-1], Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-4] and 18 more
Recent Actions
- 2026-05-13: Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 3.
- 2026-05-13: Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- 2025-01-23: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 2025-01-23: Submitted in House
- 2025-01-23: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Affirming the alliance between the United States and the Republic of Korea. — issued 2025-01-23 — PDF (4 pages)