Condemning the antisemitic terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 472
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-06-04: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Last Updated
- 2025-07-18T12:56:20Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
This House Resolution (H. Res. 472) aims to formally condemn a specific antisemitic terrorist attack that occurred in Boulder, Colorado, on June 1, 2025, while addressing broader concerns about rising antisemitism in the United States and calling for related policy actions.
Key Provisions
The resolution includes background "Whereas" clauses detailing the incident and context, followed by five main actions for the House of Representatives:
- Condemnation of the attack: Unequivocally denounces the terrorist attack on 12 innocent Americans, targeting Jewish individuals.
- Opposition to antisemitism: Condemns antisemitism in all forms and expresses concern over its increase on college campuses, online, and in public spaces.
- Support for victims and responders: Prays for the recovery of the injured and thanks police and emergency responders for their quick response.
- Call for prosecution: Demands that the perpetrator, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
- Policy urging: Calls on Congress to secure the U.S. border and deport migrants who overstay their visas.
The background notes the attack involved Molotov cocktails and a makeshift flamethrower, targeted a crowd raising awareness about hostages in Gaza, and was motivated by antisemitism, with the attacker shouting "Free Palestine." It also mentions recent related incidents and the perpetrator's visa overstay.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This is a non-binding resolution, so it introduces no changes to existing laws. It serves as a formal statement of position rather than enacting new statutes or amendments.
Potential Impacts
- On citizens: Raises public awareness of antisemitism, potentially increasing support for victims and community safety measures; may heighten scrutiny of immigration status for non-citizens.
- On government agencies: Encourages law enforcement to pursue aggressive prosecution; pressures Congress and agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to prioritize border security and visa enforcement.
- On international relations: Could strain U.S. relations with countries involved in Middle East conflicts by linking the attack to pro-Palestine activism, though its impact is likely symbolic rather than substantive.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Jewish Americans and victims: Directly supported through condemnation and calls for justice; highlights risks to elderly and Holocaust survivors.
- Law enforcement and emergency responders: Acknowledged for their role, potentially bolstering morale and resources for similar incidents.
- Immigrants and visa holders: Indirectly affected by the push for stricter deportation policies for overstays.
- Congress and policymakers: Urged to act on immigration and antisemitism, influencing bipartisan or partisan debates.
- Pro-Palestine activists: Potentially stigmatized by associating the attack with their cause, though the resolution focuses on antisemitism.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: Reinforces the application of terrorism and hate crime laws (e.g., under federal statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 2332b for acts of terrorism) without creating new ones; emphasizes full prosecution, which could set a precedent for handling similar cases.
- Constitutional: Aligns with First Amendment protections by condemning violent acts rather than speech, but the link to "pro-Palestine" rhetoric might raise debates on free expression versus hate speech.
- Political: Serves as a bipartisan signal (introduced by multiple representatives) against antisemitism amid rising incidents, potentially galvanizing support for immigration reforms; reflects partisan tensions on border security and Middle East policy, but remains symbolic as it lacks enforcement power.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Cosponsors (30)
Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11], Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24], Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2], Rep. Rogers, Mike D. [R-AL-3], Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14], Rep. McClain, Lisa C. [R-MI-9], Rep. Gooden, Lance [R-TX-5], Rep. Owens, Burgess [R-UT-4], Rep. Collins, Mike [R-GA-10], Rep. Taylor, David J. [R-OH-2], Rep. Barrett, Tom [R-MI-7], Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13], Rep. Mills, Cory [R-FL-7], Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36], Rep. Miller, Max L. [R-OH-7], Rep. Goldman, Craig A. [R-TX-12], Rep. Kustoff, David [R-TN-8], Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4], Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5], Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19], Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16], Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11], Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5], Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2], Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12], Rep. Hamadeh, Abraham J. [R-AZ-8], Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5], Rep. Knott, Brad [R-NC-13], Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6], Rep. McGuire, John J. [R-VA-5]
Recent Actions
- 2025-06-04: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 2025-06-04: Submitted in House
- 2025-06-04: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Condemning the antisemitic terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado. — issued 2025-06-04 — PDF (3 pages)