Supporting the Second Amendment's guarantee that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and commending President Trump and his administration as they work to protect Second Amendment freedoms by reviewing and eliminating any of the Biden administration's infringements on American's constitutional freedoms.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 339
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-04-17: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Last Updated
- 2025-05-05T13:59:25Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
This House Resolution (H. Res. 339) expresses strong support for the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects the right of individuals to keep and bear arms. It specifically commends President Trump and his administration for efforts to safeguard these rights by reviewing and removing policies from the Biden administration perceived as restrictions on gun ownership and related activities.
Key Provisions
The resolution includes a series of "Whereas" clauses providing background and rationale, followed by a "Resolved" section outlining the House of Representatives' positions:
- Reaffirmation of the Second Amendment: Declares ongoing support for the constitutional right to keep and bear arms without infringement.
- Criticism of Biden Administration Policies: Expresses disapproval of the Biden administration's approach to gun control, including encouragement of federal, state, and local laws seen as violating the Second Amendment, and increased rules by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF—an agency that regulates firearms).
- Opposition to Specific Agency Actions: Disapproves of ATF rules under Biden that restrict gun rights and policies by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS—a Commerce Department agency handling exports) that limit commercial firearm exports without sufficient justification.
- Praise for President Trump: Supports Trump's actions to reverse Biden-era gun control measures and commends his commitment to protecting law-abiding gun owners, firearm manufacturers, and the Constitution.
The resolution was introduced on April 17, 2025, by Rep. Williams of Texas and co-sponsors, and referred to the House Committees on the Judiciary and Foreign Affairs for review.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This is a non-binding resolution, meaning it does not create, amend, or repeal any laws. It serves as a formal statement of congressional opinion and has no direct legal effect on statutes or regulations.
Potential Impacts
- On Government Agencies: Signals congressional disapproval of ATF and BIS actions, which could encourage future oversight, funding adjustments, or policy reversals under a Trump administration, but it imposes no immediate requirements.
- On Citizens: Reinforces advocacy for gun rights among law-abiding owners, potentially boosting public confidence in Second Amendment protections, though it offers no new rights or restrictions.
- On International Relations: Indirectly addresses firearm exports via BIS criticism, which might influence U.S. trade policies with allies or partners in the arms industry, but the impact is limited to symbolic pressure rather than enforceable changes.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Gun Owners and Advocacy Groups: Law-abiding individuals and organizations like the National Rifle Association (NRA) who benefit from the resolution's supportive stance.
- Firearm Manufacturers and Industry: Companies involved in producing and exporting guns, which face scrutiny over export limits.
- Government Agencies: ATF and BIS, targeted for their recent policies.
- Political Figures and Parties: President Trump and Republican supporters gain commendation; the Biden administration and Democrats face implied criticism.
- General Public: Citizens concerned with constitutional rights, crime prevention, and government overreach, as referenced in the resolution's historical context.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Constitutional: Highlights the Second Amendment as a fundamental protection against tyranny and crime, echoing historical views (e.g., from James Madison), but does not alter Supreme Court interpretations like those in recent gun rights cases.
- Legal: As a resolution, it lacks enforceability and cannot challenge agency rules in court; it may, however, inspire litigation or legislative efforts to roll back specific regulations.
- Political: This partisan measure (introduced by Republicans) underscores divisions on gun policy, potentially energizing conservative voters and signaling a pro-Second Amendment agenda in the 119th Congress, while drawing opposition from gun control advocates. It reflects broader debates on executive overreach without resolving them.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25]
Cosponsors (21)
Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36], Rep. Biggs, Sheri [R-SC-3], Rep. Cline, Ben [R-VA-6], Rep. Cloud, Michael [R-TX-27], Rep. Crane, Elijah [R-AZ-2], Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2], Rep. Downing, Troy [R-MT-2], Rep. Fallon, Pat [R-TX-4], Rep. Haridopolos, Mike [R-FL-8], Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9], Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13], Rep. McDowell, Addison [R-NC-6], Rep. Schmidt, Derek [R-KS-2], Rep. Taylor, David [R-OH-2], Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14], Rep. Wied, Tony [R-WI-8], Rep. Moolenaar, John R. [R-MI-2], Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11], Rep. Collins, Mike [R-GA-10], Rep. Goldman, Craig A. [R-TX-12], Rep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2]
Recent Actions
- 2025-04-17: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-04-17: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-04-17: Submitted in House
- 2025-04-17: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Supporting the Second Amendment’s guarantee that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and commending President Trump and his administration as they work to protect Second Amendment freedoms by reviewing and eliminating any of the Biden administration’s infringements on American’s constitutional freedoms. — issued 2025-04-17 — PDF (4 pages)