Electing Members to certain standing committees of the House of Representatives.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 21
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Congress
- Status
- Passed House
- Latest Action
- 2025-01-09: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Last Updated
- 2026-07-11T21:24:28Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
H. Res. 21 is a House resolution that formally elects specific members of the U.S. House of Representatives to four key standing committees at the beginning of the 119th Congress. Its main goal is to organize the internal structure of the House by assigning members to committees responsible for overseeing federal spending, energy policy, financial regulations, and tax laws.
Key Provisions
- Committee on Appropriations: Elects 31 members, including Mr. Rogers of Kentucky (likely as chair or ranking member), Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Simpson, and others up to Mr. Moore of West Virginia. This committee handles federal budget and spending bills.
- Committee on Energy and Commerce: Elects 29 members, led by Mr. Latta, including Mr. Griffith, Mr. Bilirakis, and others up to Mrs. Fedorchak. This committee oversees energy, health, telecommunications, and consumer protection issues.
- Committee on Financial Services: Elects 30 members, starting with Mr. Lucas, including Mr. Sessions, Mr. Huizenga, and others up to Mr. Moore of North Carolina. This committee deals with banking, housing, insurance, and securities regulations.
- Committee on Ways and Means: Elects 28 members, beginning with Mr. Buchanan, including Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, and others up to Mr. Moran. This committee manages tax policy, trade, and Social Security.
The resolution is attested by the Clerk of the House and was passed on January 9, 2025.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This resolution does not amend statutes or create new laws; it is an internal House procedural measure. However, it updates committee memberships from the previous (118th) Congress, reflecting new elections, retirements, or reassignments. For example, it introduces newer members like Mr. Alford and Ms. Maloy to Appropriations, potentially shifting subcommittee focuses based on their expertise or priorities.
Potential Impacts
- On Government Agencies: Agencies under these committees' jurisdictions (e.g., Department of Energy, Treasury, or Health and Human Services) may face altered oversight, hearings, or funding decisions depending on the members' policy views.
- On Citizens: Could indirectly affect everyday issues like healthcare costs (via Energy and Commerce), taxes (via Ways and Means), or financial protections (via Financial Services), as committee members influence legislation that reaches the full House.
- On International Relations: Minimal direct impact, though Ways and Means and Financial Services handle trade and global finance, potentially influencing U.S. positions in international negotiations.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- House Members: The listed individuals gain committee roles, which offer influence, staff resources, and visibility in legislative debates.
- House Leadership: Party leaders (primarily Republicans, based on the names) use these assignments to advance priorities; Democrats may serve in minority roles not specified here.
- Interest Groups and Industries: Sectors like energy producers, banks, healthcare providers, and taxpayers, as committees shape regulations and funding in their areas.
- Federal Government: Executive branch agencies subject to committee scrutiny on budgets and policies.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Constitutional: Aligns with Article I of the U.S. Constitution, which grants each congressional chamber authority to determine its rules and committee structures, ensuring efficient lawmaking.
- Legal: As a simple resolution, it binds only the House and requires no presidential approval; it sets the stage for bill referrals but can be amended later via House rules.
- Political: Reflects majority party (Republican) control in the 119th Congress, with assignments favoring experienced members for continuity while integrating freshmen. This could streamline conservative priorities but spark partisan debates if minority input is limited, potentially affecting legislative productivity or bipartisanship.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Recent Actions
- 2025-01-09: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2025-01-09: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H67)
- 2025-01-09: Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H67)
- 2025-01-09: Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H67)
- 2025-01-09: Submitted in House
- 2025-01-09: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Electing Members to certain standing committees of the House of Representatives. — issued 2025-01-09 — PDF (2 pages)