Resolution memorializing law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 1252
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 2
- Policy Area
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Status
- Passed House
- Latest Action
- 2026-05-13: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Last Updated
- 2026-05-15T03:08:24Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
This resolution honors Federal, State, local, and Tribal law enforcement officers who have been killed, disabled, or injured in the line of duty. It recognizes Peace Officers Memorial Day on May 15 and National Police Week, while expressing support for officers' efforts to uphold constitutional rights and maintain public safety.
Key Provisions
- Acknowledges the valor, dignity, and integrity of law enforcement officers and their oath to protect public trust.
- References the 1962 law establishing Peace Officers Memorial Day and National Police Week.
- Lists 363 specific officers killed in the line of duty during 2025, whose names are detailed in the preamble.
- Resolves that the House of Representatives:
- Remembers and honors officers, especially those who made the ultimate sacrifice.
- Expresses support for law enforcement in preserving safe communities.
- Recognizes the need for adequate equipment, training, and resources for officer safety.
- Commends unseen acts of sacrifice and heroism by the law enforcement community.
- Offers condolences to the families of fallen officers.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This resolution introduces no changes to existing law. It is a commemorative measure that builds on the 1962 Joint Resolution (Public Law 87-726) by providing specific recognition for 2025 incidents but does not amend statutes or create new legal obligations.
Potential Impacts
- May increase public awareness and appreciation for law enforcement sacrifices.
- Could encourage continued support for officer safety initiatives without direct mandates on agencies.
- No notable effects on government agencies, citizens, or international relations, as the measure is symbolic and domestic in focus.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Law enforcement officers and their families.
- Federal, State, local, and Tribal government entities involved in policing.
- Communities and the general public who benefit from law enforcement services.
- The National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial and related commemorative organizations.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
The resolution operates within Congress's authority to pass non-binding commemorative measures and raises no constitutional concerns. It carries political implications by reinforcing bipartisan support for law enforcement while avoiding any enforcement mechanisms or policy alterations.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Cosponsors (126)
Rep. Letlow, Julia [R-LA-5], Rep. Pappas, Chris [D-NH-1], Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1], Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6], Rep. Evans, Gabe [R-CO-8], Rep. Patronis, Jimmy [R-FL-1], Rep. Bean, Aaron [R-FL-4], Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-5], Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11], Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16], Rep. Salazar, Maria Elvira [R-FL-27], Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1], Del. Moylan, James C. [R-GU-At Large], Rep. Miller-Meeks, Mariannette [R-IA-1], Rep. Shreve, Jefferson [R-IN-6], Rep. Messmer, Mark B. [R-IN-8], Rep. Mann, Tracey [R-KS-1], Rep. Schmidt, Derek [R-KS-2], Rep. Rogers, Harold [R-KY-5], Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6], Rep. Moolenaar, John R. [R-MI-2], Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8], Rep. Kelly, Trent [R-MS-1], Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4], Rep. Smith, Adrian [R-NE-3], Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2], Rep. Rouzer, David [R-NC-7], Rep. McDowell, Addison P. [R-NC-6], Rep. Knott, Brad [R-NC-13], Rep. Moore, Tim [R-NC-14], Rep. Fedorchak, Julie [R-ND-At Large], Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17], Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24], Rep. Rulli, Michael A. [R-OH-6], Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12], Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5], Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1], Rep. Bresnahan, Robert P. [R-PA-8], Rep. Kelly, Mike [R-PA-16], Rep. Fry, Russell [R-SC-7], Rep. Jackson, Ronny [R-TX-13], Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14], Rep. De La Cruz, Monica [R-TX-15], Rep. Van Duyne, Beth [R-TX-24], Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36], Rep. Hunt, Wesley [R-TX-38], Rep. Moore, Riley M. [R-WV-2], Rep. Carey, Mike [R-OH-15], Rep. Mast, Brian J. [R-FL-21], Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4] and 76 more
Recent Actions
- 2026-05-13: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2026-05-13: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 418 - 2 (Roll no. 162). (Roll call 162)
- 2026-05-13: Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 418 - 2 (Roll no. 162). (Roll call 162)
- 2026-05-13: Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3420-3421)
- 2026-05-12: At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
- 2026-05-12: DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 1252.
- 2026-05-12: Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3362-3364; text: CR H3362-3363)
- 2026-05-12: Mr. Knott moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
- 2026-05-04: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2026-05-04: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Resolution memorializing law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty. — issued 2026-05-13 — PDF (14 pages)
- Resolution memorializing law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty. — issued 2026-05-04 — PDF (14 pages)