Condemning State-level energy policies that restrict domestic oil production, increase gasoline prices, and undermine American energy security and national defense.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 1227
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 2
- Policy Area
- Energy
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2026-04-29: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Last Updated
- 2026-05-14T18:35:06Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
This House Resolution (H. Res. 1227) aims to condemn certain state-level energy policies—particularly those restricting domestic oil production and refining—that lead to higher gasoline prices, economic burdens, reduced energy independence, and risks to national defense.
Key Provisions
The resolution includes a series of "Whereas" clauses outlining supporting facts and a "Resolved" section with seven specific actions for the House of Representatives:
- Condemns state policies that restrict oil production and refining, causing higher gasoline prices.
- Notes that policies in states like California have led to significantly higher fuel costs, straining families and businesses.
- Recognizes affordable, reliable domestic energy as vital for economic stability, energy independence, and global competitiveness.
- Affirms that abundant domestic fuel is essential for U.S. military readiness.
- Expresses concern over high fuel costs and foreign energy reliance threatening national security.
- Warns against similar restrictive policies at the federal level.
- Encourages policies promoting domestic energy development, supply chains, and long-term affordability.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
None. This is a non-binding resolution (a formal statement of opinion by the House), which does not create new laws, amend statutes, or enforce requirements.
Potential Impacts
- Citizens: Highlights higher fuel costs in affected states (e.g., California) burdening working-class families, businesses, and the economy through inflation; no direct changes but may influence public debate.
- Government agencies: Draws attention to U.S. Department of Defense challenges, such as increased operational costs and risks to military readiness from fuel price volatility.
- International relations: Emphasizes reduced reliance on foreign oil to mitigate geopolitical risks; symbolic only, with no binding effects.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Consumers and businesses: Especially in high-gas-price states, facing elevated costs for fuel and goods.
- Energy industry: Domestic oil producers and refiners, potentially supported by the push for fewer restrictions.
- Military and defense personnel: U.S. Armed Forces, Department of Defense, servicemembers, and contractors impacted by fuel costs affecting readiness, recruitment, and morale.
- State governments: Targeted states like California with restrictive policies.
- Federal policymakers: Encourages pro-domestic energy approaches.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: Purely expressive; lacks force of law but referred to House Committees on Energy and Commerce and Armed Services for review.
- Constitutional: Aligns with Congress's power to express opinions on matters affecting interstate commerce, national defense (Article I, Section 8), and federal-state relations; respects state authority under the 10th Amendment while critiquing policies with national implications.
- Political: Serves as a partisan signal in energy debates, potentially shaping future legislation on federal energy policy without mandating action.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Recent Actions
- 2026-04-29: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2026-04-29: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2026-04-29: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Condemning State-level energy policies that restrict domestic oil production, increase gasoline prices, and undermine American energy security and national defense. — issued 2026-04-29 — PDF (4 pages)