Impeaching Pamela Bondi, Attorney General of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.
- Bill Number
- H.Res. 1119
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 2
- Policy Area
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2026-03-17: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Last Updated
- 2026-03-20T08:06:42Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
This resolution (H. Res. 1119) aims to impeach Pamela Bondi, the Attorney General of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. It accuses her of violating her oath of office, obstructing Congress, abusing her authority, and undermining the rule of law. If adopted by the House, it would exhibit articles of impeachment to the Senate for a trial, potentially leading to her removal from office.
Key Provisions
The resolution outlines five articles of impeachment, each detailing specific alleged misconduct:
- Article I: Obstruction of Congress – Defiance of Subpoena
Bondi is accused of willfully ignoring a subpoena from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (issued August 5, 2025) to produce unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files held by the Department of Justice (DOJ). These files relate to Epstein's sex trafficking and connections to political figures, including Donald J. Trump. The refusal is said to shield influential individuals from congressional oversight.
- Article II: Obstruction of Congress – Defiance of the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA)
Bondi allegedly violated the EFTA (signed into law November 19, 2025), which mandates full disclosure of unclassified Epstein-related records by December 19, 2025, without redactions for political sensitivity. Instead, she delayed releases, heavily redacted documents (including those implicating Trump), withheld evidence like FBI interviews with survivors, and improperly released victims' sensitive information (e.g., nude photos), prioritizing protection of administration allies over victims.
- Article III: Abuse of Investigatory and Prosecutorial Powers
Bondi is charged with misusing DOJ and FBI resources for partisan purposes, including:
- Terminating ethics officials and career staff investigating Trump, his allies, Epstein, or January 6 events.
- Launching baseless probes against Trump's opponents (e.g., James Comey, Letitia James) and journalists (e.g., Don Lemon).
- Dismissing cases against Trump allies (e.g., Eric Adams, Boeing) and ending foreign corruption probes.
- Prosecuting protesters, targeting journalists via raids, and redefining "domestic terrorism" to surveil anti-Trump groups.
- Undermining elections through raids on voting records and pressuring states for voter data.
- Article IV: Dismantling the Rule of Law Through Defiance of the Courts
Bondi is accused of repeatedly defying court orders and misleading judges, including:
- Withholding exculpatory evidence in the Comey case.
- Obtaining warrants deceptively for journalist searches.
- Presenting false information in prosecutions of protesters and others.
These actions are said to evade judicial oversight and enable unconstitutional policies.
- Article V: Perjury in Congressional Testimony
During sworn testimony (January 15, 2025, Senate Judiciary Committee; February 11, 2026, House Judiciary Committee), Bondi allegedly lied about:
- Not politicizing the DOJ or targeting based on politics (contradicted by her actions against opponents and journalists).
- Epstein-related matters, including Ghislaine Maxwell's prison conditions and lack of evidence against Trump (despite withheld files suggesting otherwise).
Each article concludes that her actions betray public trust, subvert constitutional government, and justify impeachment, trial, and removal.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This resolution does not amend or create new laws. As a House resolution, it initiates the constitutional impeachment process under Article I, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution but does not alter statutes, policies, or legal frameworks. It references existing laws like the EFTA but focuses on alleged violations rather than enacting changes.
Potential Impacts
- On Government Agencies: Could disrupt DOJ and FBI operations if Bondi is removed, leading to leadership changes, restored ethics oversight, and renewed investigations into dismissed cases (e.g., Epstein, election integrity). It might deter future politicization but could also cause internal morale issues among staff.
- On Citizens: Enhances transparency on high-profile cases like Epstein's, potentially aiding victims' justice and protecting free speech/protest rights. However, it risks chilling effects on journalism and activism if partisan probes continue unchecked. Broader effects include bolstering or eroding trust in federal law enforcement.
- On International Relations: Minimal direct impact, though dismissing foreign corruption cases (e.g., Pfizer) and election-related actions could indirectly affect U.S. credibility in global anti-corruption and democracy efforts.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Pamela Bondi: Directly targeted for removal, facing potential Senate trial and lifelong disqualification from office.
- Department of Justice and FBI: Employees, especially career staff, impacted by terminations, ethical shifts, or restored independence.
- Donald J. Trump and Allies: Accused of benefiting from protections; exposure could lead to accountability in Epstein, corruption, or election cases.
- Epstein Victims and Survivors: Potential for fuller file disclosure to support justice, but past improper releases harmed privacy.
- Congress and Judiciary: Strengthens oversight roles; defiance allegations highlight inter-branch tensions.
- Journalists, Protesters, and Political Opponents: At risk from targeted actions; resolution could safeguard their rights.
- General Public: Affects rule of law, election integrity, and government accountability.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: Invokes the Attorney General's duty under Article II, Section 3 ("take care that the laws be faithfully executed") and oaths to uphold the Constitution. Allegations of obstruction, perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), and abuse of power could support criminal referrals post-impeachment.
- Constitutional: Tests separation of powers by challenging executive defiance of Congress and courts. Impeachment upholds checks and balances but requires House majority for adoption and two-thirds Senate vote for conviction—politically challenging in a divided Congress.
- Political: Introduced by Democratic representatives (e.g., Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania), it reflects partisan divides, potentially escalating tensions in a Trump administration context (noting the 119th Congress and 2026 date). Success could set precedents for holding officials accountable for shielding allies, but failure might deepen perceptions of congressional gridlock.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Cosponsors (7)
Rep. Foushee, Valerie P. [D-NC-4], Rep. Ansari, Yassamin [D-AZ-3], Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47], Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12], Rep. Dexter, Maxine [D-OR-3], Rep. Stansbury, Melanie A. [D-NM-1], Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]
Recent Actions
- 2026-03-17: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2026-03-17: Submitted in House
- 2026-03-17: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Impeaching Pamela Bondi, Attorney General of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. — issued 2026-03-17 — PDF (17 pages)