Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117-169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes.

Bill Number: H.Res. 1075
Origin Chamber: House
Congress: 119th Congress, Session 2
Policy Area: Congress
Status: Passed House
Latest Action: 2026-02-24: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Last Updated: 2026-06-11T23:26:37Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose

H. Res. 1075 is a procedural resolution from the U.S. House of Representatives, dated February 24, 2026. Its main goal is to set the rules for debating and voting on two specific energy-related bills (H.R. 4626 and H.R. 4758) in the House, making it easier for them to move forward by waiving certain obstacles and limiting debate time. This type of resolution helps streamline the legislative process without changing laws itself.

Key Provisions

For H.R. 4626: This bill aims to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (a 1975 law that sets energy efficiency standards for appliances and products). The resolution allows immediate consideration of the bill, waives all objections (called "points of order") to its debate or content, adopts a pre-approved amendment from the Rules Committee (replacing the original committee version), treats the bill as already read, and limits further changes. Debate is capped at one hour, split equally between the majority and minority leaders of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce (or their representatives). A final vote follows without delays, except for one possible motion to send the bill back to committee for changes (a "motion to recommit").

For H.R. 4758: This bill seeks to repeal parts of Public Law 117-169 (the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act) that provide taxpayer-funded subsidies for electrifying homes, such as incentives for electric appliances or wiring upgrades. The resolution waives all points of order against the bill's consideration or provisions, treats it as already read, and orders a straight path to a vote. Debate is limited to one hour, divided equally between the Energy and Commerce Committee leaders, with one motion to recommit allowed.

In both cases, the "previous question" is automatically ordered, which means debate ends and voting begins without needing a separate vote to stop discussion.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

This resolution itself does not change any laws; it is purely procedural. However, it paves the way for H.R. 4626 to add requirements to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, ensuring new energy standards for products (like refrigerators or light bulbs) must be both technologically possible (using current tech without major barriers) and economically justified (benefits outweigh costs). For H.R. 4758, it would eliminate specific subsidy programs from the Inflation Reduction Act, removing federal funding for home electrification efforts.

Potential Impacts

On Government Agencies: The Department of Energy would face stricter limits on setting new energy efficiency rules under H.R. 4626, potentially slowing or blocking regulations. Repealing subsidies via H.R. 4758 could reduce funding and administrative burdens for programs under the Inflation Reduction Act, affecting agencies like the Department of Energy and Treasury.

On Citizens: Homeowners and renters might lose access to tax credits or rebates for switching to electric heating, stoves, or wiring (impacting energy costs and climate goals). Broader energy standards could lead to fewer mandates on appliances, possibly lowering upfront costs for consumers but slowing energy savings.

On International Relations: Minimal direct impact, though changes to U.S. energy efficiency standards and subsidies could affect global climate commitments (e.g., under the Paris Agreement) by reducing incentives for reducing fossil fuel use in homes.

Overall, these bills could shift U.S. energy policy toward less regulation and fewer green incentives, influencing household energy choices and national emissions.

Main Stakeholders Affected

Congress Members: Especially those on the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, who control debate time.
Energy Industry and Manufacturers: Appliance makers and energy companies could benefit from fewer efficiency mandates (H.R. 4626) but face uncertainty from subsidy cuts (H.R. 4758).
Consumers and Taxpayers: Everyday people funding subsidies and buying energy products; low-income households may lose affordability aids for electrification.
Environmental Groups: Likely opposed, as repeals could hinder efforts to reduce carbon emissions from homes.
Federal Agencies: Department of Energy staff involved in standards and subsidy programs would see operational changes.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

Legal: The resolution's waivers of points of order (rules that block bills for procedural flaws, like budget impacts under the Congressional Budget Act) could bypass standard checks, potentially leading to challenges if the bills become law. H.R. 4626 reinforces existing legal tests for regulations (feasibility and justification) without new constitutional issues.

Constitutional: No direct conflicts, as Congress has authority over energy policy and spending under Article I. However, repealing recent laws (H.R. 4758) highlights the Constitution's allowance for frequent policy reversals via majority votes.

Political: This fast-tracks controversial bills in a divided Congress, possibly along partisan lines (e.g., Republicans favoring deregulation). It limits minority input through short debate, which could fuel accusations of rushing anti-climate measures, affecting bipartisan energy talks. If passed, these changes might influence future elections by energizing debates on government spending and environmental protection.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9]

Recent Actions

2026-02-24: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2026-02-24: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 187 (Roll no. 74). (text: CR H2269) (Roll call 74)
2026-02-24: Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 187 (Roll no. 74). (text: CR H2269) (Roll call 74)
2026-02-24: On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 208 - 189 (Roll no. 73). (Roll call 73)
2026-02-24: Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2277-2279)
2026-02-24: POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1075, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2026-02-24: DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1075.
2026-02-24: Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2269-2276)
2026-02-24: Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 62.
2026-02-24: The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4626 and H.R. 4758 under a closed rule with one motion to recommit for each bill. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each bill.
2026-02-24: The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-515, by Mr. Griffith.
2026-02-24: The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-515, by Mr. Griffith.

Bill Versions

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117–169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes. — issued 2026-02-24 — PDF (2 pages)
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117–169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes. — issued 2026-02-24 — PDF (4 pages)