Securing Partner Supply Chains Act

Bill Number

H.R. 7675

Origin Chamber

House

Congress

119th Congress, Session 2

Policy Area

International Affairs

Status

Introduced

Latest Action

2026-03-26: Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 3.

Last Updated

2026-04-21T22:05:22Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose

The Securing Partner Supply Chains Act aims to strengthen global investment security by requiring the U.S. Secretary of State to create a temporary initiative that helps allied and partner countries screen foreign investments for national security risks. This addresses vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, sensitive technology, and supply chains from potentially harmful foreign influences, while leveraging U.S. expertise to build resilience among partners.

Key Provisions

• Establishment of the Initiative: Within 180 days of enactment, the Secretary of State must establish the Initiative on Foreign Investment Screening, which will operate for 3 years. It will be led by the Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment (or a designee) and coordinated with other U.S. government agencies as needed.
• Core Duties:
• Offer technical assistance, training, and advice to foreign countries on best practices for reviewing foreign investments to identify national security risks (e.g., threats to critical infrastructure like power grids or supply chains for essential goods).
• Promote coordination among U.S. agencies, private businesses, partner countries, and civil society groups to develop shared standards for secure investments.
• Help partner countries build and apply their own screening systems through guidance and information sharing.
• Evaluate how well partner countries are progressing in creating strong screening processes.
• Conduct outreach and training programs to raise awareness of investment-related security threats worldwide.
• Reporting Requirements: The Secretary must submit annual reports to Congress (starting one year after enactment, for three years total) covering:
• Details of assistance and training provided.
• Progress assessments for partner countries.
• Analysis of new security risks from foreign investments.
• Suggestions for ongoing U.S. involvement.
• Explanations for designating specific countries as partners.
• Definitions:
• Foreign investment: Money or assets invested in a country's economy by non-citizens or foreign entities.
• National security risk: Threats involving key infrastructure, advanced technologies, supply chain weaknesses, or harmful foreign interference.
• Partner country: Nations with U.S. free trade agreements, mutual defense treaties, or others selected by the Secretary.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

This bill introduces a new, standalone program without directly amending prior laws like the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which handles U.S.-based screenings. It expands U.S. foreign policy tools by formalizing assistance to allies on investment screening, filling a gap where many countries lack such mechanisms.

Potential Impacts

• Government Agencies: The Department of State will gain a dedicated, short-term initiative requiring coordination with agencies like the Treasury or Defense, potentially increasing administrative workload and funding needs (though not specified in the bill).
• Citizens: Indirect benefits through more secure global supply chains, reducing risks of disruptions or espionage that could affect U.S. consumers, jobs, or economy; no direct impact on individual rights.
• International Relations: Enhances U.S. alliances by building partner capacities against shared threats (e.g., from adversarial nations), fostering goodwill and cooperation on economic security without imposing U.S. standards.

Main Stakeholders Affected

• U.S. Government: Department of State (primary implementer), congressional committees on foreign affairs (oversight via reports), and other agencies involved in coordination.
• Partner Countries: Nations qualifying as partners (e.g., via trade or defense pacts) receive training and support to protect their economies.
• Private Sector and Civil Society: U.S. and foreign businesses benefit from standardized security practices; civil society groups participate in coordination to promote transparency.
• Foreign Investors and Entities: Face increased scrutiny in partner countries, potentially limiting access to markets if risks are identified.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

• Legal: The initiative emphasizes voluntary assistance and information sharing, avoiding mandates on foreign governments, which respects sovereignty. It aligns with existing U.S. export control and security laws but adds a diplomatic layer without new enforcement powers.
• Constitutional: No apparent conflicts; it falls under Congress's authority to regulate foreign affairs and commerce, promoting national security through executive implementation.
• Political: Positions the U.S. as a leader in countering economic coercion (e.g., from state-directed investments), potentially influencing bipartisan support for supply chain resilience amid geopolitical tensions; the 3-year sunset clause allows evaluation before permanence.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Castro, Joaquin [D-TX-20]

Cosponsors (4)

Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40], Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17], Rep. Sherman, Brad [D-CA-32], Rep. Baird, James R. [R-IN-4]

Recent Actions

• 2026-03-26: Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 3.
• 2026-03-26: Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
• 2026-02-25: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
• 2026-02-25: Introduced in House
• 2026-02-25: Introduced in House

Bill Versions

• Securing Partner Supply Chains Act — issued 2026-02-25 — PDF (6 pages)