Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act

Bill Number

H.R. 6996

Origin Chamber

House

Congress

119th Congress, Session 2

Policy Area

Foreign Trade and International Finance

Status

Introduced

Latest Action

2026-04-22: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 37 - 7.

Last Updated

2026-05-21T12:20:27Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose of the Legislation

The "Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act" (H.R. 6996) aims to boost the global export of U.S.-developed artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, including software models, computing hardware like semiconductors, cloud services, data centers, and related standards. It seeks to position the U.S. as the leader in AI by encouraging allies and partners to adopt American AI systems, while restricting access by foreign adversaries (such as China). The goal is to drive economic growth, enhance national security, and promote U.S. values in international AI governance.

Key Provisions

• Findings and Policy Statement (Sections 2-3): Congress declares the U.S. must win the global AI competition for economic, military, and societal benefits. U.S. policy emphasizes maintaining AI dominance, promoting the "U.S. full AI stack" (a complete ecosystem of AI-enabling hardware, software, and infrastructure developed or provided by U.S. entities) among allies, reducing export barriers, countering Chinese influence, preventing adversary access, and ensuring U.S. control over most global AI computing power.

• Industry Consortia Program (Section 4): The Secretary of Commerce must create a program to solicit proposals from industry groups (formed solely for this purpose) that meet U.S. security standards to export the U.S. full AI stack to allies. A report on the program's status is due to Congress within 180 days of launch.

• Eliminating Foreign Barriers (Section 5): The Secretary of State, with Commerce input, must intensify efforts to remove overseas obstacles to U.S. AI exports, including industry listening sessions, a reporting hotline, and diplomatic advocacy. A diplomatic strategy must be developed within 180 days to ease market access, highlight benefits of U.S. AI, and push for AI standards in international bodies that align with U.S. values. An implementation report follows 180 days later.

• Study on Global AI Deployment (Section 6): The Secretary of State, with input from National Intelligence and Commerce, must study the impacts of exporting U.S. AI, covering economic/diplomatic benefits, leadership effects, global prosperity gains, competitive positioning versus foreign tech, security enhancements, and priority export regions. A report, with possible classified annex, is due within 180 days.

• Security of U.S. AI Semiconductor Products (Section 7): Commerce, coordinated with State, Defense, and Energy, must collaborate with foreign buyers to implement safeguards against unauthorized access by adversaries. A report within 180 days details plans for secure deployment, international agreements, buyer security obligations, supply chain risks, and other measures (unclassified with possible classified annex).

• AI Full Stack Confidence Initiative (Section 8): Within 180 days, Commerce (with State, Defense, Energy, and industry input) must develop standards, practices, or products to build trust in the privacy, security, and effectiveness of U.S. AI for major foreign buyers' economic and security needs.

• AI Full Stack Export Success Tracker (Section 9): Commerce, with National Intelligence and State, must produce biannual estimates for five years on U.S. AI export progress, tracking metrics like national computing capacity (total processing power in a country, measured in floating-point operations per second or FLOP/s), memory bandwidth (data transfer speed), U.S.-designed AI chips globally, U.S.-operated data centers/cloud services, and AI model usage (measured by "tokens," basic data units processed). Reports are public with possible classified annexes.

• Definitions (Section 10): Key terms include "full AI stack" (AI-enabling infrastructure like hardware and cloud services), "foreign adversaries" (e.g., nations like China under existing law), "U.S. full AI stack" (U.S.-controlled elements), and technical metrics like computing capacity and tokens.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

This bill introduces new programs and mandates rather than directly amending prior laws. It builds on existing export controls (e.g., under the Export Administration Regulations) by shifting focus toward promoting exports to trusted partners while enhancing security reviews. It creates novel tools like industry consortia, diplomatic strategies, and tracking metrics, which were not previously required, to actively drive AI exports and monitor global adoption.

Potential Impacts

• On Government Agencies: Increases coordination and workload for the Departments of Commerce, State, Defense, and Energy, including new reporting (multiple 180-day deadlines) and diplomatic efforts. This could strain resources but formalize AI export promotion as a federal priority.

• On Citizens: U.S. citizens may benefit from strengthened economic competitiveness and job growth in AI sectors, potentially leading to innovation in healthcare, education, and prosperity. However, it emphasizes national security over domestic AI access equity.

• On International Relations: Strengthens alliances by prioritizing U.S. AI adoption among partners, potentially improving diplomatic ties and countering authoritarian influence (e.g., China) in global standards bodies. It could heighten tensions with adversaries through access restrictions, affecting trade and tech supply chains.

Main Stakeholders Affected

• U.S. AI Companies and Industry Groups: Benefit from reduced barriers and government support for exports, gaining market access but facing stricter security compliance.
• Allies and Partner Nations: Gain easier access to advanced U.S. AI for economic and security gains, with requirements to adopt safeguards against adversaries.
• Foreign Adversaries (e.g., China): Face restricted access to U.S. technology, potentially limiting their AI development and escalating geostrategic competition.
• U.S. Government Agencies and Congress: Gain tools for oversight and policy implementation, with committees (House Foreign Affairs; Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs) receiving regular reports.
• Global Consumers and Developing Countries: Could see improved AI-driven services (e.g., healthcare, education) via U.S. exports, but dependent on adoption in priority regions.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

• Legal: Reinforces executive authority in trade and security (e.g., via Commerce and State powers) without major new enforcement mechanisms, but requires adherence to existing export laws. Reports with classified annexes balance transparency and security.
• Constitutional: Aligns with Congress's commerce and foreign affairs powers (Article I, Section 8); no apparent free speech or privacy conflicts, though security measures could raise data protection concerns under international law.
• Political: Advances a pro-innovation, America-first agenda in AI, potentially bipartisan on national security but divisive on trade implications. It signals U.S. intent to shape global AI norms, influencing future treaties or tech rivalries without mandating budget increases.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Fine, Randy [R-FL-6]

Cosponsors (1)

Rep. Huizenga, Bill [R-MI-4]

Recent Actions

• 2026-04-22: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 37 - 7.
• 2026-04-22: Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
• 2026-01-09: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
• 2026-01-09: Introduced in House
• 2026-01-09: Introduced in House

Bill Versions

• Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act — issued 2026-01-09 — PDF (13 pages)