AI for America Act

Bill Number

H.R. 6304

Origin Chamber

House

Congress

119th Congress, Session 1

Policy Area

Science, Technology, Communications

Status

Introduced

Latest Action

2025-11-25: Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Last Updated

2026-06-19T08:06:34Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose of the Legislation

The "AI for America Act" (H.R. 6304) aims to establish a national strategy for artificial intelligence (AI) that strengthens U.S. leadership in the field, reduces unnecessary government rules that slow AI adoption, and ensures AI systems use data free from security threats (like hacking risks) and ideological bias (unfair slants in data or decisions based on political views). It focuses on planning, partnerships, and safeguards to advance AI safely and competitively.

Key Provisions

• Action Plan for AI Development: By July 31, 2027, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), working with other federal agencies, must submit a detailed action plan to key congressional committees (House Science, Space, and Technology; Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation). This plan includes specific, trackable goals (measurable milestones) on:
• Building U.S. AI leadership, training a skilled workforce, forming partnerships between government and private companies, and protecting against security risks and ideological bias.
• Upgrading research facilities for civilian (non-military) AI projects.
• Creating public-private partnerships involving the Department of Energy, NASA, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and National Science Foundation.
• The plan must be updated and resubmitted at least every two years.

• Identifying Regulatory Barriers: Within one year of the bill's enactment, the OSTP Director, consulting with leaders from the Departments of Energy, Health and Human Services, and Transportation (plus other relevant agencies), must identify government rules that hinder AI use in key areas like healthcare, scientific research, transportation, and other sectors deemed important.

• NIST Report on AI Risks and Bias: Within one year, the NIST Director must submit a report to the same congressional committees outlining ways to spot and stop security risks and ideological bias in AI systems. This includes:
• Tools like internal checks, outside audits (independent reviews), and requirements for public transparency.
• How federal agencies evaluate these issues and any fixes they've applied.
• The report can be included in updates to NIST's existing AI risk framework (a set of guidelines under the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act).

• Definition of AI: The bill uses the existing legal definition of "artificial intelligence" from the 2020 National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act, which covers systems that perform tasks requiring human-like intelligence, such as learning or decision-making.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

This bill does not overhaul current laws but adds new requirements for federal planning and reporting. It builds on the 2020 AI Initiative Act by mandating specific action plans, barrier identifications, and bias/security reports, which were not previously required in this structured way. It codifies (formally writes into law) a strategy that was previously more advisory, making it a binding federal priority with timelines and congressional oversight.

Potential Impacts

• On Government Agencies: Agencies like OSTP and NIST will face new duties to develop plans, conduct reviews, and report regularly, potentially increasing coordination and resources for AI policy. This could streamline federal AI efforts but add administrative workload.
• On Citizens: Everyday people may benefit from faster AI adoption in sectors like healthcare (e.g., better diagnostics) and transportation (e.g., safer autonomous vehicles), plus a more skilled workforce through training programs. Safeguards against bias could make AI fairer in public services.
• On International Relations: By emphasizing U.S. leadership and security, the bill could boost America's global AI competitiveness against rivals like China, influencing trade, tech standards, and alliances, but it might strain relations if seen as protectionist.

Main Stakeholders Affected

• Federal Government: OSTP, NIST, Departments of Energy, Health and Human Services, and Transportation; NASA and National Science Foundation for partnerships.
• Private Sector: Tech companies, AI developers, and businesses in healthcare, research, and transportation, who gain from reduced barriers and collaboration opportunities.
• Workforce and Researchers: Workers needing AI skills, scientists, and educators benefiting from infrastructure upgrades and training.
• Congress: Committees overseeing science and commerce, which receive reports and updates for accountability.
• General Public: Users of AI in daily life, protected by bias and security measures.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

• Legal: The bill reinforces executive branch duties under existing AI laws without creating new enforcement powers, but its focus on "ideological bias" could lead to debates over what counts as bias (e.g., free speech concerns if it limits certain viewpoints). Reports and plans must align with broader laws on data privacy and security.
• Constitutional: No direct challenges, but requirements for public disclosure and audits support transparency under the First Amendment; however, defining and regulating "ideological bias" might raise questions about government overreach into private AI development.
• Political: It promotes a pro-innovation agenda to counter foreign competition, potentially bipartisan on leadership but divisive on bias (e.g., views on "woke" AI or censorship). Referred to key committees, it signals congressional intent to shape AI policy amid rapid tech growth.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Kiggans, Jennifer A. [R-VA-2]

Cosponsors (2)

Rep. LaLota, Nick [R-NY-1], Rep. Begich, Nicholas J. [R-AK-At Large]

Recent Actions

• 2025-11-25: Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
• 2025-11-25: Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
• 2025-11-25: Introduced in House
• 2025-11-25: Introduced in House

Bill Versions

• AI for America Act — issued 2025-11-25 — PDF (5 pages)