Intelligence Community Property Security Act of 2025
- Bill Number
- H.R. 6195
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Armed Forces and National Security
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-11-20: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Last Updated
- 2026-04-10T15:09:57Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
The Intelligence Community Property Security Act of 2025 aims to strengthen security for properties controlled by U.S. intelligence agencies by criminalizing unauthorized access to areas marked as off-limits, thereby protecting sensitive national security information and facilities.
Key Provisions
- Prohibition on Unauthorized Access: It is illegal to enter any property under the control of a U.S. intelligence community element (such as the CIA or NSA) that is clearly marked as closed or restricted, without proper permission. This applies within U.S. jurisdiction.
- Penalties for Violations:
- First offense: A fine (as defined under U.S. criminal law), imprisonment for up to 180 days, or both.
- Second offense: A fine, imprisonment for up to 3 years, or both.
- Third or subsequent offense: A fine, imprisonment for up to 10 years, or both.
- Amendments to Existing Law: Adds a new Section 1115 to the National Security Act of 1947 and updates the Act's table of contents accordingly.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This bill introduces specific criminal penalties for trespassing on intelligence community properties, which were not explicitly outlined in the National Security Act of 1947 before. Previously, such actions might have been handled under general trespass or espionage laws, but this creates a targeted framework with escalating punishments to deter repeat violations.
Potential Impacts
- On Government Agencies: Enhances protection for intelligence facilities, potentially reducing security risks and easing enforcement for agencies like the FBI or Department of Defense in prosecuting intruders.
- On Citizens: Increases legal risks for individuals who accidentally or intentionally enter restricted areas, such as protesters, journalists, or curious visitors near intelligence sites; clear markings are required to trigger penalties, which may encourage better public awareness.
- On International Relations: Minimal direct impact, though it could indirectly support U.S. national security by safeguarding intelligence assets from foreign espionage attempts.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Intelligence Community Elements: Agencies like the CIA, NSA, and others that manage restricted properties benefit from stronger legal protections.
- Law Enforcement and Judiciary: Federal prosecutors and courts will handle new cases under this law, potentially increasing workload for violations.
- General Public: Citizens, including activists or media personnel, who interact with or approach intelligence sites, face heightened consequences for unauthorized entry.
- Legislators and Oversight Bodies: Members of Congress and committees (e.g., the House Judiciary Committee, where the bill was referred) involved in national security policy.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal Implications: Establishes a clear, tiered penalty structure for a specific type of trespass, aligning with broader U.S. efforts to protect classified information; it relies on "clearly marked" properties to avoid vagueness challenges in court.
- Constitutional Implications: Could intersect with First Amendment rights if applied to public protests near intelligence sites, but the focus on marked restricted areas likely upholds due process by providing fair notice; no direct challenges to privacy or other rights are evident.
- Political Implications: Sponsored by bipartisan House members focused on national security, it reflects ongoing congressional priorities to bolster defenses against threats like insider risks or foreign interference, without major controversy anticipated given its narrow scope.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Cosponsors (5)
Rep. Cline, Ben [R-VA-6], Rep. Stefanik, Elise M. [R-NY-21], Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2], Rep. Steube, W. Gregory [R-FL-17], Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]
Recent Actions
- 2025-11-20: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2025-11-20: Introduced in House
- 2025-11-20: Introduced in House
Bill Versions
- Intelligence Community Property Security Act of 2025 — issued 2025-11-20 — PDF (3 pages)