Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in DC Act of 2025

Bill Number: H.R. 5107
Origin Chamber: House
Congress: 119th Congress, Session 1
Policy Area: Crime and Law Enforcement
Status: Passed House
Latest Action: 2025-11-20: Received in the Senate.
Last Updated: 2026-06-11T23:26:34Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose

This legislation, titled the "Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in DC Act of 2025" (or "CLEAN DC Act of 2025"), aims to repeal most of the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. Law 24-345), a local law passed by the District of Columbia (DC) Council. The goal is to undo changes made by the 2022 Act to DC's policing and justice policies, restoring earlier legal frameworks except in specified areas.

Key Provisions

Full Repeal with Exceptions: The entire 2022 Act is repealed, except for two parts:
Subtitle S of Title I (sections starting at 5-365.01 in the D.C. Official Code), which likely addresses specific policing reforms (exact details not specified in this bill).
Subtitle A of Title I (sections starting at 5-125.01 and section 5-302 in the D.C. Official Code), which covers other foundational elements of policing oversight.
Restoration of Prior Laws: Any DC laws that were amended or repealed by the 2022 Act are automatically restored or revived to their pre-2022 state, treating the 2022 Act as if it never existed (again, except for the preserved subtitles).

Significant Changes to Existing Law

This bill reverses the 2022 Act's broad reforms to DC's policing and justice system, which had introduced new rules on police accountability, use of force, and related practices.
It reinstates previous versions of affected DC laws without needing further local action, effectively overriding the DC Council's changes through federal authority.
The exceptions ensure that certain core provisions of the 2022 Act remain in effect, maintaining some reforms related to police training, oversight, or accountability mechanisms (based on the section references).

Potential Impacts

On Government Agencies: DC's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and justice-related agencies may see operational changes, such as altered guidelines on arrests, investigations, or officer conduct, reverting to pre-2022 standards. This could increase administrative burdens for compliance with restored laws.
On Citizens: DC residents, particularly those interacting with law enforcement, may experience shifts in police practices—potentially more permissive under restored laws—impacting community safety, civil rights protections, and trust in policing.
On International Relations: No direct impacts, as this is a domestic matter focused on local DC governance.
Overall, it could lead to short-term legal uncertainties during the transition but aims to standardize enforcement practices in line with federal preferences.

Main Stakeholders Affected

DC Residents and Communities: Directly impacted by changes in policing standards, potentially affecting daily interactions with law enforcement and access to justice reforms.
DC Law Enforcement and Justice Agencies: Including the MPD and DC Council, who must adapt to restored laws, possibly facing challenges in training and policy implementation.
Federal Government: Congress exercises its authority over DC (as the district lacks full statehood), influencing local autonomy.
Advocacy Groups: Organizations focused on police reform, civil rights, or law-and-order may support or oppose the repeal based on their priorities.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

Legal: The bill leverages Congress's exclusive legislative power over DC under Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, allowing federal override of local laws without DC's consent. This could spark litigation if seen as infringing on local self-governance.
Constitutional: Highlights tensions between federal control and DC's limited home rule (established by the 1973 DC Home Rule Act), raising questions about the balance of powers in non-state territories.
Political: Represents federal intervention in local progressive reforms, potentially fueling debates on national vs. local control over policing amid broader U.S. discussions on criminal justice. It may influence future DC-federal relations and set precedents for congressional involvement in district affairs.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9]

Cosponsors (29)

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3], Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8], Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1], Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13], Rep. Crane, Elijah [R-AZ-2], Rep. Boebert, Lauren [R-CO-4], Rep. Roy, Chip [R-TX-21], Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15], Rep. Biggs, Sheri [R-SC-3], Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1], Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19], Rep. Gill, Brandon [R-TX-26], Rep. Amodei, Mark E. [R-NV-2], Rep. Nehls, Troy E. [R-TX-22], Rep. Van Duyne, Beth [R-TX-24], Rep. Burchett, Tim [R-TN-2], Rep. Davidson, Warren [R-OH-8], Rep. Bean, Aaron [R-FL-4], Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1], Rep. Brecheen, Josh [R-OK-2], Rep. Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7], Rep. Gosar, Paul A. [R-AZ-9], Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5], Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3], Rep. Begich, Nicholas J. [R-AK-At Large], Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5], Rep. Cuellar, Henry [D-TX-28], Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19], Rep. Hinson, Ashley [R-IA-2]

Recent Actions

2025-11-20: Received in the Senate.
2025-11-19: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2025-11-19: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 190 (Roll no. 299). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4800-4801) (Roll call 299)
2025-11-19: Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 190 (Roll no. 299). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4800-4801) (Roll call 299)
2025-11-19: Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4806-4807)
2025-11-19: POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 5107, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Clyde demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2025-11-19: The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
2025-11-19: DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 5107.
2025-11-19: Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80.
2025-11-19: Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 879. (consideration: CR H4800-4805)
2025-11-17: Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 879 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80.
2025-09-30: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 271.
2025-09-30: Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 119-317.
2025-09-30: Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 119-317.
2025-09-10: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 19.

Bill Versions

Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in DC Act of 2025 — issued 2025-11-19 — PDF (4 pages)
Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in DC Act — issued 2025-09-03 — PDF (2 pages)
Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in DC Act of 2025 — issued 2025-09-30 — PDF (4 pages)