To require members of the Armed Forces performing active service in the District of Columbia in response to an order of the President which relates to crime or civil disturbance in the District of Columbia to participate in a program substantially similar to the Body-Worn Camera Program of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia.
- Bill Number
- H.R. 5051
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-08-26: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Last Updated
- 2025-08-30T08:05:31Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose This bill requires members of the U.S. Armed Forces who are deployed on active service in the District of Columbia under a presidential order addressing crime or civil disturbance to wear body-worn cameras, following rules similar to those used by the District of Columbia's Metropolitan Police Department.
Key Provisions
- Members of the Armed Forces must participate in a body-worn camera program that is substantially similar to the Metropolitan Police Department's program under the Body-Worn Camera Regulation and Reporting Requirements Act of 2015 (D.C. Official Code).
- The requirement applies specifically when service occurs in response to a presidential order related to crime or civil disturbance in the District of Columbia.
- The provision takes effect 30 days after the bill becomes law.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- The bill introduces a new federal requirement that extends body-worn camera standards from local District of Columbia police to certain military personnel.
- It does not amend broader statutes on military deployment or domestic law enforcement but adds a narrow accountability measure for camera use in specified situations.
Potential Impacts
- Government agencies: The Department of Defense would need to implement camera programs and data-handling procedures for affected service members.
- Citizens: Residents of the District of Columbia could see increased video documentation of interactions involving military personnel during relevant deployments.
- No direct effects on international relations are described in the legislation.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Members of the Armed Forces assigned to the described service.
- The Department of Defense and its service branches.
- The District of Columbia government, including its police department.
- The President, as the authority issuing the relevant orders.
- Residents and visitors in the District of Columbia during such deployments.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- The measure addresses accountability for military personnel in domestic settings by requiring video recording.
- It raises questions about the application of local police standards to federal military forces without altering the underlying authority for presidential orders.
- Implementation would involve coordination between federal military commands and District of Columbia regulations on camera use, storage, and access.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
Cosponsors (1)
Recent Actions
- 2025-08-26: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- 2025-08-26: Introduced in House
- 2025-08-26: Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E789)
- 2025-08-26: Introduced in House
Bill Versions
- To require members of the Armed Forces performing active service in the District of Columbia in response to an order of the President which relates to crime or civil disturbance in the District of Columbia to participate in a program substantially similar to the Body-Worn Camera Program of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia. — issued 2025-08-26 — PDF (2 pages)