To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue certain regulations to update the definition of motorcycle, and for other purposes.

Bill Number

H.R. 3385

Origin Chamber

House

Congress

119th Congress, Session 1

Policy Area

Transportation and Public Works

Status

Introduced

Latest Action

2026-02-10: Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

Last Updated

2026-05-20T08:08:16Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose

This legislation, H.R. 3385, aims to modernize the federal definition of a "motorcycle" by directing the Secretary of Transportation to update relevant regulations. The goal is to align the definition with a clearer, more specific standard that reflects the original design and operational characteristics of such vehicles.

Key Provisions

• Regulatory Timeline: The Secretary of Transportation must issue necessary regulations within 120 days of the bill's enactment to amend the definition.
• Updated Definition: The term "motorcycle" is defined as a motor vehicle (as originally manufactured) that includes:
• Motive power (an engine or motor to propel it).
• A seat or saddle where the rider sits astride (straddling the vehicle).
• Design for travel on no more than three wheels touching the ground.
• Steering via handlebars.
• Acceleration and braking controlled by handlebar and foot mechanisms.
• Capability to reach speeds over 30 miles per hour.

This definition applies specifically to updating section 571.3 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, which governs motor vehicle safety standards.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

• The bill revises the current regulatory definition of "motorcycle" in 49 CFR 571.3 to incorporate the new, detailed criteria.
• Previously, the definition was broader or less precise (e.g., it may not have explicitly required handlebar steering, foot controls, or a minimum speed capability), potentially leading to ambiguities in classifying vehicles like certain three-wheeled or autocycle designs.
• This change ensures the definition focuses on the vehicle's original manufacturing intent, excluding modifications that might alter its classification.

Potential Impacts

• Government Agencies: The Department of Transportation (DOT) and its National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) will need to implement and enforce the updated definition, possibly affecting vehicle certification, safety testing, and compliance oversight.
• Citizens: Motorcycle riders and owners may experience clearer rules for licensing, registration, and safety equipment requirements, reducing confusion over what qualifies as a motorcycle versus other vehicles (e.g., mopeds or autocycles). This could influence insurance rates or road usage rights.
• International Relations: Minimal direct impact, though it may align U.S. standards more closely with international norms for vehicle safety, potentially easing trade in motorcycle parts or models.
• Broader effects could include improved road safety by standardizing classifications, but it might require some vehicle owners to reclassify or modify their bikes to comply.

Main Stakeholders Affected

• Motorcycle Manufacturers and Importers: Companies producing or selling two- or three-wheeled vehicles will need to ensure their designs meet the new criteria to comply with federal safety standards.
• Riders and Consumers: Individuals who own or operate motorcycles, especially those with non-traditional designs (e.g., reverse trikes or high-speed scooters), may face changes in how their vehicles are regulated.
• State Governments: Agencies handling vehicle registration and licensing could see shifts in how they categorize motorcycles under federal guidelines.
• Safety Advocates and Insurers: Groups focused on traffic safety and insurance providers may benefit from reduced ambiguity in vehicle types, aiding in risk assessment.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

• Legal: Strengthens uniformity in federal motor vehicle safety standards (under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act), potentially reducing litigation over vehicle classifications. No major challenges to existing authority are introduced, as it builds on the DOT's rulemaking powers.
• Constitutional: Aligns with Congress's authority to regulate interstate commerce and promote safety; no apparent conflicts with states' rights or individual freedoms, though it could indirectly affect personal vehicle choices.
• Political: As a targeted update introduced in the 119th Congress, it reflects bipartisan interest in transportation policy but may spark debate among stakeholders on whether the definition overly restricts innovation (e.g., electric or autonomous vehicles) or enhances safety. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, it underscores focus on regulatory efficiency without broader overhauls.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

Cosponsors (4)

Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23], Rep. Fitzgerald, Scott [R-WI-5], Rep. LaHood, Darin [R-IL-16], Rep. Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6]

Recent Actions

• 2026-02-10: Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
• 2026-02-10: Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
• 2025-05-14: Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.
• 2025-05-14: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
• 2025-05-14: Introduced in House
• 2025-05-14: Introduced in House

Bill Versions

• To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue certain regulations to update the definition of motorcycle, and for other purposes. — issued 2025-05-14 — PDF (2 pages)