America—Israel AI Cooperation Act

Bill Number

H.R. 3303

Origin Chamber

House

Congress

119th Congress, Session 1

Policy Area

International Affairs

Status

Introduced

Latest Action

2025-05-08: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Last Updated

2025-06-09T13:29:42Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose of the Legislation

The America--Israel AI Cooperation Act (H.R. 3303) aims to simplify U.S. export rules for certain advanced integrated circuits—key components in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies—by granting Israel an exception from standard license requirements. This promotes easier technology sharing between the U.S. and Israel to support AI development and cooperation.

Key Provisions

• Directed Modification of Export Rules: The Secretary of Commerce, through the Undersecretary for Industry and Security (part of the Bureau of Industry and Security, or BIS), must update an existing interim rule called "Framework for Artificial Intelligence Diffusion" (published in the Federal Register on January 23, 2025).
• Inclusion of Israel: Israel must be added to a specific list of countries in Supplement No. 5 to Part 740 of Title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This list identifies nations eligible for streamlined export processes.
• Equal Treatment for Exports: Exports of controlled items (advanced integrated circuits related to AI) to Israel will face the same requirements and exceptions as exports to other countries on that list, effectively waiving certain export licenses.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

• The bill overrides other laws to force a specific change to the interim rule, which currently regulates AI-related exports to prevent sensitive technology from spreading to adversaries.
• It expands the list of "trusted" countries for AI tech exports without needing new licenses, treating Israel like allies such as the United Kingdom or Australia under existing export control frameworks.
• This is a targeted amendment rather than a broad overhaul, focusing only on the specified rule and items.

Potential Impacts

• On Government Agencies: The Department of Commerce's BIS will need to implement the rule change promptly, potentially reducing administrative workload for exports to Israel but requiring updates to regulations and monitoring compliance.
• On Citizens and Businesses: U.S. companies in the tech and semiconductor sectors (e.g., those producing AI chips) will benefit from faster, less bureaucratic exports to Israel, boosting trade and innovation. Israeli firms and researchers gain easier access to U.S. technology, fostering joint AI projects.
• On International Relations: Strengthens U.S.-Israel ties in technology and defense, aligning with broader strategic partnerships. It could indirectly affect global AI supply chains by prioritizing allies, but may raise concerns about technology diffusion to non-allied regions.

Main Stakeholders Affected

• U.S. Government: Department of Commerce (BIS) as the primary implementer; Congress for oversight of foreign policy and trade.
• U.S. Businesses: Exporters of advanced integrated circuits and AI technologies, who face fewer barriers.
• Israeli Entities: Government, tech companies, and research institutions, which will receive streamlined access to U.S. exports.
• Broader Tech Sector: Global semiconductor and AI industries, potentially influencing competition and collaboration.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

• Legal: The bill uses "notwithstanding any other provision of law" to direct executive rulemaking, which is a common congressional tool to influence agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act. It ensures the change applies to the final version of the interim rule, avoiding delays.
• Constitutional: Aligns with Congress's authority over foreign commerce (Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution), but could spark debate on balancing national security with bilateral alliances in export controls.
• Political: Highlights U.S. support for Israel amid geopolitical tensions, potentially influencing debates on technology export policies. No direct constitutional challenges are evident, but it may prompt scrutiny from national security advocates concerned about AI proliferation risks.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5]

Recent Actions

• 2025-05-08: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
• 2025-05-08: Introduced in House
• 2025-05-08: Introduced in House

Bill Versions

• America—Israel AI Cooperation Act — issued 2025-05-08 — PDF (2 pages)