Defense Workforce Integration Act of 2025
- Bill Number
- H.R. 3241
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Armed Forces and National Security
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-05-07: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Last Updated
- 2025-12-05T06:48:49Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose of the Legislation
The Defense Workforce Integration Act of 2025 aims to improve the integration of military and civilian workforces within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). It focuses on creating smoother transitions for individuals who are medically disqualified from military service, directing them toward civilian roles in defense-related fields to support national security and workforce efficiency.
Key Provisions
- Integration of Hiring Processes (Section 2): Requires the Secretary of Defense, working with military department heads, to create a program within one year of enactment. This program provides pathways for "entry-level service members" who are medically disqualified to move into qualified civilian jobs within the DoD or its components. "Entry-level service members" are defined as active or reserve personnel attending (or scheduled to attend within 90 days) basic training, technical schools, service academies, Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC), or officer training programs. The Air Force's existing DRIVE (Develop, Redistribute, Improve, Vault, Expose) program serves as a model but is not mandatory for other branches.
- Information on Defense Careers for Medically Disqualified Individuals (Section 3): Adds a new Section 996 to Chapter 50 of Title 10, U.S. Code (which covers general military powers). This establishes a DoD program to inform and refer medically disqualified individuals to job, apprenticeship, and training opportunities in areas like the defense industrial base (companies and organizations supporting military needs), cybersecurity, intelligence support, defense technology research, disaster preparedness, or other roles aligned with U.S. national interests. The Secretary must collaborate with defense industry entities, other federal agencies, and academic institutions.
- Navy-Specific Career Information (Section 4): Mandates that the Secretary of the Navy include details on career opportunities at the Military Sealift Command (which operates civilian-crewed ships for military support) and shipbuilding workforce training programs. This information must be provided to all Navy personnel during the Transition Assistance Program (a standard process to help service members prepare for post-military life).
- Reporting Requirement (Section 5): The Secretary of Defense must submit a report to the Senate and House Armed Services Committees within one year of enactment, detailing how Sections 2 and 4, plus the new Section 996, have been implemented.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- Introduces a new statutory program under Title 10, U.S. Code, specifically Section 996, which did not previously exist. This formalizes DoD's role in redirecting medically disqualified individuals to civilian defense opportunities.
- Builds on existing programs like the Air Force's DRIVE initiative and the Navy's Transition Assistance Program by expanding them or using them as baselines, without altering their core structures.
- No major repeals or overhauls of prior laws; changes are additive, focusing on information-sharing and pathways rather than mandatory hiring quotas.
Potential Impacts
- On Government Agencies: The DoD and military departments (e.g., Army, Navy, Air Force) will need to develop and coordinate new programs, potentially increasing administrative workload but improving talent retention and recruitment. Collaboration with other agencies and academia could enhance inter-agency efficiency.
- On Citizens: Medically disqualified individuals and entry-level service members gain access to alternative career paths in high-demand defense sectors, reducing barriers to employment and supporting economic stability for those affected by medical issues. Navy personnel benefit from expanded transition support, aiding smoother post-service careers.
- On International Relations: Minimal direct impact; the bill focuses on domestic workforce integration and does not address foreign policy, alliances, or global operations.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Medically Disqualified Individuals and Entry-Level Service Members: Primary beneficiaries, receiving guidance and pathways to civilian defense jobs.
- Department of Defense and Military Branches: Responsible for implementation, including hiring and program coordination.
- Defense Industrial Base: Gains potential new talent through referrals for roles in manufacturing, technology, and support services.
- Navy Personnel: Receive targeted information on sealift and shipbuilding careers during transitions.
- Congress (Armed Services Committees): Oversees implementation via the required report.
- Academic Institutions and Other Federal Agencies: Involved in consultations to support training and referrals.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: Strengthens DoD's authority under Title 10 to manage human resources without creating new enforcement mechanisms or liabilities. The one-year implementation timeline provides clear deadlines but allows flexibility (e.g., using existing programs as models). No conflicts with anti-discrimination laws, as it targets medical disqualifications specifically.
- Constitutional: Aligns with Congress's enumerated powers over the military (Article I, Section 8) by enhancing national defense readiness. No apparent free speech, privacy, or due process concerns, as the bill emphasizes voluntary information and referrals.
- Political: Promotes bipartisan support for military personnel welfare and defense industry growth, potentially appealing to veterans' advocates and workforce development groups. It addresses talent shortages in defense sectors amid recruitment challenges, without introducing controversial elements like budget mandates or forced integrations.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Rep. Kiggans, Jennifer A. [R-VA-2]
Cosponsors (23)
Rep. Courtney, Joe [D-CT-2], Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2], Rep. Panetta, Jimmy [D-CA-19], Rep. Turner, Michael R. [R-OH-10], Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20], Rep. Norcross, Donald [D-NJ-1], Rep. Davis, Donald G. [D-NC-1], Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1], Rep. Messmer, Mark B. [R-IN-8], Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17], Rep. LaLota, Nick [R-NY-1], Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5], Rep. Bell, Wesley [D-MO-1], Rep. Golden, Jared F. [D-ME-2], Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1], Rep. Garbarino, Andrew R. [R-NY-2], Rep. Crow, Jason [D-CO-6], Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1], Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1], Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7], Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4], Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47], Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]
Recent Actions
- 2025-05-07: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- 2025-05-07: Introduced in House
- 2025-05-07: Introduced in House
Bill Versions
- Defense Workforce Integration Act of 2025 — issued 2025-05-07 — PDF (4 pages)