Keep Our Girls Safe Act of 2025

Bill Number

H.R. 2452

Origin Chamber

House

Congress

119th Congress, Session 1

Policy Area

Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues

Status

Introduced

Latest Action

2025-03-27: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Last Updated

2025-07-21T19:44:15Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose

The legislation, titled the "Keep Our Girls Safe Act of 2025," aims to clarify and restrict access to locker room facilities in educational settings under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Title IX is a federal law that prohibits discrimination based on sex in programs receiving federal funding, such as schools and universities. The bill specifies that "sex" for this purpose is determined only by an individual's reproductive biology and genetics at birth, ensuring locker rooms are used exclusively by individuals of the same biological sex during active use.

Key Provisions

• Short Title: The act is officially named the "Keep Our Girls Safe Act of 2025."
• Prohibition on Locker Room Access: It makes it unlawful under Title IX for an individual of one biological sex (defined solely by reproductive biology and genetics at birth) to enter or use a locker room that is actively in use by individuals of a different biological sex, in connection with any educational program or activity.
• Scope: Applies specifically to locker room facilities in active use, such as those tied to physical education, sports, or other school-related activities.
• Effective Date: The law takes effect 30 days after its enactment into law.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

• This bill introduces a strict biological definition of sex for locker room access under Title IX, overriding broader interpretations of "sex" that may include gender identity (a person's internal sense of their gender, which may differ from their birth sex).
• Previously, Title IX enforcement has allowed some accommodations for transgender individuals based on guidance from the U.S. Department of Education, but this act would prohibit such access in shared locker rooms, potentially limiting flexibility in school policies.

Potential Impacts

• On Government Agencies: Educational institutions receiving federal funds (e.g., public schools, colleges) must comply to avoid losing funding, requiring updates to facilities, policies, and enforcement mechanisms. The Department of Education may need to revise its Title IX guidance and oversight processes.
• On Citizens: Primarily affects students, particularly transgender or gender-nonconforming individuals, who may face barriers to participating in school activities. It could enhance privacy and safety perceptions for cisgender students (those whose gender identity matches their birth sex), especially girls, but may increase exclusion or discomfort for others.
• On International Relations: No direct impact, as the bill focuses on domestic U.S. education policy.

Main Stakeholders Affected

• Educational Institutions: Schools, universities, and related organizations must implement and enforce the restrictions.
• Students and Families: Especially female students (targeted for protection) and transgender students (potentially restricted); parents may influence school policies through advocacy.
• Educators and Administrators: Teachers, coaches, and school officials responsible for compliance and handling related incidents.
• Advocacy Groups: Organizations focused on women's rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and civil liberties, which may support or oppose the bill.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

• Legal Implications: Could lead to lawsuits challenging enforcement, as it may conflict with anti-discrimination protections under Title IX or other laws like the Equal Protection Clause (part of the 14th Amendment, which requires equal treatment under the law). Courts might need to interpret the bill's narrow focus on locker rooms versus broader Title IX rights.
• Constitutional Implications: Raises questions about due process (fair treatment under the law) and equal protection, particularly if the biological sex definition is seen as discriminating against transgender individuals without a compelling reason.
• Political Implications: The bill reflects ongoing debates over gender identity in public spaces, potentially polarizing discussions on privacy, safety, and inclusion in education. As an introduced bill (H.R. 2452 in the 119th Congress), its passage would depend on congressional support and could influence future Title IX regulations.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15]

Cosponsors (13)

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24], Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large], Rep. Biggs, Sheri [R-SC-3], Rep. Tiffany, Thomas P. [R-WI-7], Rep. Burchett, Tim [R-TN-2], Rep. Owens, Burgess [R-UT-4], Rep. McCormick, Richard [R-GA-7], Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3], Rep. Onder, Robert [R-MO-3], Rep. Boebert, Lauren [R-CO-4], Rep. Harris, Andy [R-MD-1], Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8], Rep. LaMalfa, Doug [R-CA-1]

Recent Actions

• 2025-03-27: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
• 2025-03-27: Introduced in House
• 2025-03-27: Introduced in House

Bill Versions

• Keep Our Girls Safe Act of 2025 — issued 2025-03-27 — PDF (2 pages)