Maritime Supply Chain Security Act

Bill Number

H.R. 2390

Origin Chamber

House

Congress

119th Congress, Session 1

Policy Area

Transportation and Public Works

Status

Passed House

Latest Action

2025-06-10: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Last Updated

2026-07-11T03:08:23Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose

The Maritime Supply Chain Security Act (H.R. 2390) aims to strengthen the security of U.S. port infrastructure by allowing federal funds to be used specifically for replacing hardware or software in port cranes linked to China. This addresses potential vulnerabilities in the maritime supply chain, ensuring safer and more secure port operations.

Key Provisions

• Amends Section 54301(a)(3)(A)(ii)(III) of Title 46, United States Code, which governs the Port Infrastructure Development Program.
• Expands eligible projects to include:
• Upgrading or replacing port cranes or their parts (including hardware and software).
• Targeting cranes or parts that were installed, provided, maintained, controlled, or sponsored by the People's Republic of China or its government entities.
• Retains existing allowances for projects improving port resilience while adding these new security-focused uses.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

• Previously, the law allowed funds for general port resilience projects but did not explicitly mention replacing Chinese-origin crane technology.
• The amendment restructures the language by striking vague phrasing ("including projects to improve port resilience;") and inserting a detailed list that explicitly includes anti-China replacement projects as eligible activities.
• This clarification broadens the scope of fund usage without altering the overall program structure.

Potential Impacts

• On government agencies: The U.S. Department of Transportation's Maritime Administration, which oversees the program, may see increased grant applications and spending focused on security upgrades, potentially straining budgets if demand rises.
• On citizens and economy: Enhances national security by reducing risks of cyber threats or espionage in ports, which handle critical trade; could lead to more reliable supply chains, benefiting consumers through stable goods flow.
• On international relations: May heighten tensions with China by signaling U.S. efforts to decouple from Chinese technology in strategic infrastructure, potentially affecting bilateral trade or diplomatic discussions on supply chain issues.

Main Stakeholders Affected

• Port authorities and operators: Directly benefit from funding access for crane replacements, improving operational security.
• Shipping and maritime industry: Gains from safer ports, potentially reducing downtime from security risks.
• U.S. government entities: Including Congress and the Maritime Administration, responsible for implementing and funding the program.
• Chinese government and firms: Indirectly impacted, as their equipment becomes ineligible for U.S. port use with federal support, possibly limiting market access.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

• Legal: Reinforces existing federal authority over maritime infrastructure funding under Title 46, providing clear statutory guidance to avoid disputes over fund eligibility; no direct challenges to constitutional rights, as it focuses on government spending.
• Constitutional: Aligns with Congress's power to regulate commerce and national security (Article I, Section 8), without infringing on free speech or due process.
• Political: Reflects growing U.S. bipartisan concerns over foreign influence in critical infrastructure, potentially setting precedents for similar restrictions on other nations' technology; could fuel debates on trade policies and supply chain resilience amid geopolitical rivalries.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Rouzer, David [R-NC-7]

Recent Actions

• 2025-06-10: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
• 2025-06-09: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
• 2025-06-09: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2548-2549)
• 2025-06-09: Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2548-2549)
• 2025-06-09: DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2390.
• 2025-06-09: Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2548-2549)
• 2025-06-09: Mr. Ezell moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
• 2025-06-06: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 114.
• 2025-06-06: Reported by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. H. Rept. 119-145.
• 2025-06-06: Reported by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. H. Rept. 119-145.
• 2025-04-02: Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
• 2025-04-02: Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
• 2025-04-02: Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Discharged
• 2025-03-27: Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
• 2025-03-26: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Bill Versions

• Maritime Supply Chain Security Act — issued 2025-06-09 — PDF (4 pages)
• Maritime Supply Chain Security Act — issued 2025-03-26 — PDF (3 pages)
• Maritime Supply Chain Security Act — issued 2025-06-10 — PDF (3 pages)
• Maritime Supply Chain Security Act — issued 2025-06-06 — PDF (6 pages)