Military Spouse Hiring Act
- Bill Number
- H.R. 2033
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Taxation
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-03-11: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Last Updated
- 2026-05-22T18:20:25Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
The Military Spouse Hiring Act (H.R. 2033) aims to encourage employers to hire spouses of military personnel by expanding eligibility for the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC). The WOTC is a federal tax incentive that reduces an employer's tax liability for hiring individuals from certain targeted groups facing employment barriers.
Key Provisions
- Expansion of Eligible Groups: Amends Section 51(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include "qualified military spouses" as a new category eligible for the WOTC, alongside existing groups like veterans, ex-felons, and long-term unemployed individuals.
- Definition of Qualified Military Spouse: Adds a new paragraph to Section 51(d) defining a "qualified military spouse" as any individual certified by a designated local agency (typically a state workforce agency) as being the spouse of a member of the U.S. Armed Forces on the date of hire.
- Effective Date: The changes apply to wages paid or incurred after the date of enactment for individuals who begin work after that date.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- Previously, the WOTC did not explicitly include military spouses as a targeted group, though some might qualify under other categories (e.g., if they were long-term unemployed). This bill adds them as a distinct, standalone category, simplifying eligibility and removing potential gaps.
- No changes to the credit amount (up to $9,600 per eligible employee, depending on factors like wages and hours worked) or certification process, but it broadens the pool of qualifying hires.
Potential Impacts
- On Citizens: Military spouses, who often face frequent relocations and employment challenges due to their partner's service, may find it easier to secure jobs, improving family financial stability and reducing reliance on public assistance.
- On Employers: Businesses gain a direct tax incentive to hire from this group, potentially lowering hiring costs and encouraging recruitment efforts targeted at military communities.
- On Government Agencies: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will administer more WOTC claims, possibly increasing workload and short-term federal revenue loss from tax credits (estimated in billions annually for the program overall). No direct impact on international relations, as it focuses on domestic military support.
- Broader Economic Effects: Could boost employment in areas near military bases, supporting local economies without significant new spending.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Military Spouses: Primary beneficiaries, gaining easier access to job opportunities.
- Employers: Especially those in industries with high turnover or near military installations, who can claim tax credits.
- U.S. Armed Forces Members: Indirectly benefited through improved support for their families.
- Government Entities: IRS for tax administration; state workforce agencies for certifications; Congress and the Department of Defense for oversight of military family programs.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: Strengthens the existing WOTC framework without altering its core mechanics, ensuring compliance with tax code requirements for certification to prevent abuse. No challenges to enforceability anticipated.
- Constitutional: Aligns with Congress's authority under Article I to levy taxes and provide for the military, promoting equal employment incentives without infringing on individual rights.
- Political: Bipartisan sponsorship (from both parties) reflects broad support for military families; could set precedent for further expansions of tax credits to other underserved groups, potentially influencing future budget and tax policy debates.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Rep. Beyer, Donald S. [D-VA-8]
Cosponsors (127)
Rep. Kelly, Mike [R-PA-16], Rep. Panetta, Jimmy [D-CA-19], Rep. Carter, John R. [R-TX-31], Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11], Rep. Larson, John B. [D-CT-1], Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2], Rep. Jacobs, Sara [D-CA-51], Rep. Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" [R-TN-3], Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6], Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1], Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5], Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-28], Rep. McBath, Lucy [D-GA-6], Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26], Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21], Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large], Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1], Rep. Turner, Michael R. [R-OH-10], Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1], Rep. Sorensen, Eric [D-IL-17], Rep. Bishop, Sanford D. [D-GA-2], Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9], Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1], Rep. Hinson, Ashley [R-IA-2], Rep. DeGette, Diana [D-CO-1], Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4], Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1], Rep. Rose, John W. [R-TN-6], Rep. Gonzales, Tony [R-TX-23], Rep. Valadao, David G. [R-CA-22], Rep. Houlahan, Chrissy [D-PA-6], Rep. Morelle, Joseph D. [D-NY-25], Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1], Rep. Flood, Mike [R-NE-1], Rep. Kiggans, Jennifer A. [R-VA-2], Rep. Sherrill, Mikie [D-NJ-11], Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12], Rep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8], Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17], Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2], Rep. Pappas, Chris [D-NH-1], Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6], Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-5], Rep. Kelly, Robin L. [D-IL-2], Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-26], Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23], Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7], Rep. Luttrell, Morgan [R-TX-8], Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11], Rep. Mann, Tracey [R-KS-1] and 77 more
Recent Actions
- 2025-03-11: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 2025-03-11: Introduced in House
- 2025-03-11: Introduced in House
Bill Versions
- Military Spouse Hiring Act — issued 2025-03-11 — PDF (2 pages)