Life Month Resolution
- Bill Number
- H.J.Res. 98
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 1
- Policy Area
- Health
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2025-06-03: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Last Updated
- 2026-06-11T00:41:22Z
AI-Generated Summary
Purpose
This joint resolution (H.J. Res. 98) aims to express congressional support for designating the month of June as "Life Month." It emphasizes the fundamental right to life as outlined in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and celebrates the Supreme Court's 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, which returned authority over abortion regulations to states and elected representatives. The resolution promotes a "culture of life" by recognizing the value of all human life, particularly the unborn, and encourages support for pregnant women and families.
Key Provisions
- Designation of Life Month: The House and Senate support annually recognizing June as "Life Month."
- Affirmation of Life's Value: It declares every human life as a sacred gift with inherent dignity and worth, reaffirming the Declaration of Independence's principle that life is an unalienable right.
- Commendation of Supporters: It praises individuals, parents, families, faith-based organizations, and communities that promote life-affirming values and provide care to those in need.
- Call to Action for Policymakers: It urges lawmakers to pass laws protecting unborn life and to allocate resources that help women and families choose to continue pregnancies.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
This is a non-binding joint resolution, so it introduces no changes to existing laws or statutes. It serves as a symbolic expression of congressional intent rather than enforceable legislation.
Potential Impacts
- On Government Agencies: Minimal direct impact, as it does not mandate actions or funding; however, it could encourage agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services to highlight life-affirming programs in public communications.
- On Citizens: It may raise awareness about pro-life issues, potentially influencing public opinion and community support for pregnancy resource centers. No enforceable requirements affect individual rights or obligations.
- On International Relations: No direct effects, though it aligns with U.S. domestic values on human rights and could indirectly shape diplomatic discussions on global life and family policies.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Pro-Life Advocates and Organizations: Faith-based groups, pregnancy resource centers, and anti-abortion activists, who are commended and encouraged by the resolution.
- Pregnant Women and Families: Highlighted as beneficiaries of support services and resources aimed at choosing life.
- Policymakers and Elected Officials: Urged to enact protective laws, potentially influencing state and federal legislation on abortion and family support.
- Medical Professionals and Communities: Recognized for their roles in providing care and promoting life-affirming choices.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legal: As a resolution, it has no legal force but references the Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade (1973) and shifted abortion regulation to states, reinforcing federalism (the division of powers between federal and state governments).
- Constitutional: It echoes the Declaration of Independence's philosophical foundations but does not alter the U.S. Constitution; it could spark debates on the role of moral or religious principles in governance.
- Political: Introduced by Republican representatives, it signals partisan support for pro-life policies post-Dobbs, potentially polarizing debates on reproductive rights and influencing electoral strategies around family and life issues. It may encourage similar symbolic gestures in state legislatures.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4]
Cosponsors (24)
Rep. Carter, John R. [R-TX-31], Rep. Biggs, Sheri [R-SC-3], Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2], Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17], Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1], Rep. Cline, Ben [R-VA-6], Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8], Rep. Cloud, Michael [R-TX-27], Rep. Smith, Adrian [R-NE-3], Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9], Rep. Shreve, Jefferson [R-IN-6], Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15], Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5], Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12], Rep. Bean, Aaron [R-FL-4], Rep. Thompson, Glenn [R-PA-15], Rep. Harrigan, Pat [R-NC-10], Rep. Houchin, Erin [R-IN-9], Rep. Brecheen, Josh [R-OK-2], Rep. Harris, Andy [R-MD-1], Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-5], Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11], Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8], Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]
Recent Actions
- 2025-06-03: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-06-03: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2025-06-03: Introduced in House
- 2025-06-03: Introduced in House
Bill Versions
- Life Month Resolution — issued 2025-06-03 — PDF (3 pages)