Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Temporary Amendment Act of 2026.
- Bill Number
- H.J.Res. 193
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 2
- Policy Area
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2026-06-03: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Last Updated
- 2026-06-24T15:37:15Z
AI-Generated Summary
Summary of H.J. Res. 193
Purpose
This joint resolution expresses congressional disapproval of a specific action taken by the District of Columbia Council. It aims to prevent a temporary amendment related to body-worn camera rules from taking effect.
Key Provisions
- The resolution disapproves the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Temporary Amendment Act of 2026 (D.C. Act 26-305).
- This D.C. law was enacted by the Council on April 22, 2026, and sent to Congress on April 29, 2026.
- The disapproval is based on authority under section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- If approved, the resolution would block the D.C. Council's temporary amendment from becoming law, maintaining current rules on body-worn camera transparency in use-of-force situations.
- No new federal requirements are added; the focus is on overriding the local D.C. measure.
Potential Impacts
- Government agencies: Limits the D.C. Council's ability to implement changes to police camera policies, affecting local law enforcement operations.
- Citizens: May delay or prevent increased transparency measures for use-of-force incidents involving D.C. police.
- International relations: No direct effects noted.
Main Stakeholders
- The District of Columbia Council and local government.
- D.C. law enforcement agencies.
- Residents of the District of Columbia.
- Members of Congress with oversight responsibilities.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- This resolution exercises Congress's oversight power over D.C. laws under the Home Rule Act, highlighting the federal government's authority to review and reject local legislation.
- It underscores the unique legal status of the District, where Congress can intervene in local matters without broader constitutional changes.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Cosponsors (8)
Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17], Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9], Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5], Rep. Crane, Elijah [R-AZ-2], Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19], Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8], Rep. Begich, Nicholas J. [R-AK-At Large], Rep. Davidson, Warren [R-OH-8]
Recent Actions
- 2026-06-03: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 2026-06-03: Introduced in House
- 2026-06-03: Introduced in House
Bill Versions
- Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Body-Worn Camera Transparency for Use of Force Temporary Amendment Act of 2026. — issued 2026-06-03 — PDF (2 pages)