Expressing support for the Federal Protective Service and its law enforcement officers.
- Bill Number
- H.Con.Res. 97
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 2
- Policy Area
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Status
- Introduced
- Latest Action
- 2026-05-12: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- Last Updated
- 2026-05-21T20:31:56Z
AI-Generated Summary
Summary of H. Con. Res. 97: Expressing Support for the Federal Protective Service and Its Law Enforcement Officers
Purpose
This concurrent resolution aims to formally recognize and show appreciation from Congress for the Federal Protective Service (FPS)—the agency responsible for securing over 8,500 federal buildings—and its law enforcement officers who protect federal workers, contractors, visitors, and the public from threats like crime, terrorism, and emergencies.
Key Provisions
The resolution includes:
- Preamble ("Whereas" clauses): Highlights FPS's role in protecting federal facilities, upholding the law, facing dangers (e.g., threats, protests, security checks), collaborating with other agencies, and deserving respect for their service and sacrifices.
- Resolved actions (four main points):
- Recognizes the dedication of FPS personnel in protecting federal facilities and the nation.
- Expresses gratitude to FPS officers and their families for their sacrifices.
- Honors FPS officers who died in the line of duty.
- Encourages ongoing collaboration between FPS and the communities it serves (e.g., federal employees and visitors) to build trust, safety, and awareness.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
- None. This is a concurrent resolution, a non-binding expression of Congress's opinion that does not create new laws, appropriate funds, or amend existing statutes. It requires approval by both the House and Senate but does not need the President's signature.
Potential Impacts
- Symbolic and morale-boosting: Reinforces public and congressional support for FPS, potentially improving officer morale and community relations at federal sites.
- No direct operational or financial effects: Does not allocate resources, change policies, or mandate actions.
- Minimal impact on citizens or international relations: Primarily domestic, focused on U.S. federal properties; could indirectly foster better security awareness among federal workers and visitors.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- FPS law enforcement officers and their families: Direct recipients of recognition and gratitude.
- Federal employees, contractors, and visitors: Beneficiaries of FPS protection and improved community ties.
- Congress and federal agencies: Signals bipartisan support (introduced by Representatives Boebert, Nehls, and Van Drew; referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure).
- State and local partners: Encouraged to collaborate with FPS.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Non-binding nature: Carries no legal force but serves as a political statement of support, potentially influencing future funding or policy discussions for FPS (part of the Department of Homeland Security).
- Constitutional alignment: Aligns with Congress's power to oversee federal operations and express sentiments via resolutions (Article I).
- Political context: Demonstrates cross-party appreciation for law enforcement, honoring oaths to the Constitution and public service amid routine dangers like protests and threats. No controversial elements; purely supportive.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Cosponsors (2)
Rep. Nehls, Troy E. [R-TX-22], Rep. Van Drew, Jefferson [R-NJ-2]
Recent Actions
- 2026-05-12: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- 2026-05-12: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Expressing support for the Federal Protective Service and its law enforcement officers. — issued 2026-05-12 — PDF (3 pages)