Expressing support for law enforcement officers.
- Bill Number
- H.Con.Res. 96
- Origin Chamber
- House
- Congress
- 119th Congress, Session 2
- Policy Area
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Status
- Passed House
- Latest Action
- 2026-05-14: Received in the Senate.
- Last Updated
- 2026-07-10T15:23:27Z
AI-Generated Summary
Summary of H. Con. Res. 96
Purpose
This concurrent resolution expresses congressional appreciation and support for law enforcement officers, recognizing their daily contributions to public safety and community well-being.
Key Provisions
- The resolution includes multiple "whereas" statements that describe law enforcement duties, including upholding the rule of law, responding to crises, and reducing crime and drug overdoses.
- It notes specific policy concerns, such as efforts to reduce police funding and sanctuary city policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
- It highlights reported declines in homicide rates, drug overdose deaths, and violent crime in major cities.
- The operative section states that Congress:
- Values the contributions of law enforcement to communities and the nation.
- Recognizes the personal risks officers take in their work.
- Provides wholehearted support for law enforcement personnel.
Significant Changes to Existing Law
As a concurrent resolution, this measure does not amend, repeal, or alter any existing statutes. It functions solely as a non-binding statement of congressional sentiment with no force of law.
Potential Impacts
- On government agencies: The resolution may encourage continued or increased support for local police departments in resource allocation and policy decisions.
- On citizens: It could reinforce public recognition of law enforcement roles and promote community-police cooperation.
- On international relations: No direct effects are outlined in the resolution.
Main Stakeholders Affected
- Law enforcement officers and their employing agencies at local, state, and federal levels.
- Communities served by these officers, including residents in urban and rural areas.
- Members of Congress and other elected officials involved in public safety policy.
- Advocacy groups focused on policing, immigration enforcement, and criminal justice.
Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications
- Legally, the resolution carries no enforceable obligations or penalties.
- Constitutionally, it falls within Congress's authority to adopt resolutions expressing opinions on domestic matters.
- Politically, the document emphasizes law-and-order priorities while addressing criticisms of reduced policing and sanctuary policies, though it imposes no new requirements on any party.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.
Sponsor
Cosponsors (25)
Rep. Hunt, Wesley [R-TX-38], Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9], Rep. Hinson, Ashley [R-IA-2], Rep. Wied, Tony [R-WI-8], Rep. Edwards, Chuck [R-NC-11], Rep. Feenstra, Randy [R-IA-4], Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11], Rep. Haridopolos, Mike [R-FL-8], Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2], Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4], Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4], Rep. Kiggans, Jennifer A. [R-VA-2], Rep. Mast, Brian J. [R-FL-21], Rep. Moore, Tim [R-NC-14], Rep. Taylor, David J. [R-OH-2], Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24], Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12], Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4], Rep. McDowell, Addison P. [R-NC-6], Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36], Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12], Rep. Maloy, Celeste [R-UT-2], Rep. Miller-Meeks, Mariannette [R-IA-1], Rep. Rulli, Michael A. [R-OH-6], Rep. Baird, James R. [R-IN-4]
Recent Actions
- 2026-05-14: Received in the Senate.
- 2026-05-13: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2026-05-13: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 243 - 173, 3 Present (Roll no. 165). (text: CR H3428) (Roll call 165)
- 2026-05-13: Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 243 - 173, 3 Present (Roll no. 165). (text: CR H3428) (Roll call 165)
- 2026-05-13: Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3436)
- 2026-05-13: POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Con.Res 96, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Raskin demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- 2026-05-13: The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- 2026-05-13: DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 96.
- 2026-05-13: Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.
- 2026-05-13: Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1275. (consideration: CR H3428-3434)
- 2026-05-12: Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1275 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, H. Con. Res. 96 and H.R. 8469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5625, H.R. 6260, H.R. 8365, and H.Con.Res. 96 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8469 under a structured rule. The resolution makes in order one motion to recommit on each bill.
- 2026-05-07: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2026-05-07: Submitted in House
Bill Versions
- Expressing support for law enforcement officers. — issued 2026-05-13 — PDF (4 pages)
- Expressing support for law enforcement officers. — issued 2026-05-07 — PDF (3 pages)