Denouncing the horrors of socialism.

Bill Number: H.Con.Res. 58
Origin Chamber: House
Congress: 119th Congress, Session 1
Policy Area: Government Operations and Politics
Status: Passed House
Latest Action: 2025-12-01: Received in the Senate.
Last Updated: 2026-07-10T15:08:29Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose

This concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 58) aims to formally denounce socialism in all its forms and express opposition to the implementation of socialist policies in the United States. It frames socialism as inherently opposed to American founding principles like individual liberty and property rights, using historical examples to underscore its perceived dangers.

Key Provisions

Historical Condemnations: The resolution lists numerous examples of socialism's alleged failures, including:
Mass deaths and famines under leaders like Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Fidel Castro, Pol Pot, and others, with estimates of over 100 million deaths worldwide.
Specific events such as the Bolshevik Revolution, Soviet gulags, the Holodomor in Ukraine, China's Great Leap Forward, Cambodia's killing fields, North Korean famines, Cuban expropriations, and Venezuela's economic collapse.
Quotes from Founding Fathers: It cites Thomas Jefferson on the violation of property rights through redistribution and James Madison on the insecurity of personal liberty under arbitrary seizures.
Core Resolution Statement: Congress declares that the U.S. was founded on individual sanctity, which socialism's collectivist nature fundamentally opposes, and thus denounces it entirely.
Procedural Note: Passed by the House on November 21, 2025; requires Senate concurrence to be adopted.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

This is a concurrent resolution, which is a formal expression of congressional opinion and does not carry the force of law. It introduces no changes to statutes, regulations, or legal frameworks. Instead, it serves as a non-binding statement without enforceable effects.

Potential Impacts

On Government Agencies: Minimal direct impact, as it lacks legal authority; however, it could influence rhetorical positions in foreign policy or domestic debates, potentially guiding executive branch communications on international relations with socialist-leaning nations.
On Citizens: Symbolic effect on public discourse, possibly reinforcing anti-socialist sentiments among voters or shaping political narratives around economic policies like wealth redistribution or government intervention.
On International Relations: May signal U.S. opposition to socialist regimes (e.g., in Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea), affecting diplomatic tone but not altering treaties or sanctions directly.

Main Stakeholders Affected

U.S. Congress: Primary actors, as it reflects a bipartisan or partisan stance (originating in the House) on ideological issues.
American Citizens and Political Groups: Those involved in debates over economic systems, including conservatives opposing socialism, progressives advocating social programs, and voters influenced by historical narratives.
International Actors: Governments and leaders cited (e.g., in Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea) may view it as criticism, potentially straining relations; exile communities from those countries could see it as supportive.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

Legal/Constitutional: Fully constitutional under Congress's power to express opinions (Article I); it does not infringe on free speech or rights, as it is advisory and non-binding. No court challenges are likely, given its declarative nature.
Political: Highlights ideological divides in U.S. politics, potentially energizing anti-socialist movements or drawing accusations of partisanship. As a resolution, it could set a precedent for future symbolic condemnations of ideologies, influencing electoral rhetoric without substantive policy shifts.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Salazar, Maria Elvira [R-FL-27]

Cosponsors (63)

Rep. Scalise, Steve [R-LA-1], Rep. Huizenga, Bill [R-MI-4], Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4], Rep. Gimenez, Carlos A. [R-FL-28], Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-26], Rep. Wilson, Joe [R-SC-2], Rep. Burchett, Tim [R-TN-2], Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40], Rep. Nehls, Troy E. [R-TX-22], Rep. Moolenaar, John R. [R-MI-2], Rep. Jackson, Ronny [R-TX-13], Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11], Rep. Cloud, Michael [R-TX-27], Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6], Rep. Turner, Michael R. [R-OH-10], Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4], Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1], Rep. Miller-Meeks, Mariannette [R-IA-1], Rep. Fulcher, Russ [R-ID-1], Rep. Hurd, Jeff [R-CO-3], Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1], Rep. Fry, Russell [R-SC-7], Rep. Estes, Ron [R-KS-4], Rep. McDowell, Addison P. [R-NC-6], Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19], Rep. Stefanik, Elise M. [R-NY-21], Rep. Moore, Tim [R-NC-14], Rep. Baird, James R. [R-IN-4], Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24], Rep. Walberg, Tim [R-MI-5], Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15], Rep. McGuire, John J. [R-VA-5], Rep. Allen, Rick W. [R-GA-12], Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5], Rep. Moore, Riley M. [R-WV-2], Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4], Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17], Rep. McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10], Rep. Cline, Ben [R-VA-6], Rep. Rulli, Michael A. [R-OH-6], Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25], Rep. Letlow, Julia [R-LA-5], Rep. Rose, John W. [R-TN-6], Rep. Haridopolos, Mike [R-FL-8], Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36], Rep. Mills, Cory [R-FL-7], Rep. Simpson, Michael K. [R-ID-2], Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12], Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14], Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-41] and 13 more

Recent Actions

2025-12-01: Received in the Senate.
2025-11-21: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2025-11-21: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 285 - 98, 2 Present (Roll no. 305). (text: CR H4883) (Roll call 305)
2025-11-21: Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 285 - 98, 2 Present (Roll no. 305). (Roll call 305)
2025-11-21: The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule on the concurent resolution and preamble.
2025-11-21: DEBATE - The House resumed debate on H. Con. Res. 58.
2025-11-21: WORDS TAKEN DOWN - During the course of debate, exception was taken to certain words used and a demand was made to have the words take down. Ms. Salazar asked unanimous consent to withdraw the words, Without Objection, the words were withdrawn.
2025-11-21: DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 58.
2025-11-21: Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80.
2025-11-21: Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 879. (consideration: CR H4883-4890)
2025-11-17: Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 879 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80.
2025-10-24: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
2025-10-24: Submitted in House
2025-10-24: Submitted in House

Bill Versions

Denouncing the horrors of socialism. — issued 2025-11-21 — PDF (4 pages)
Denouncing the horrors of socialism. — issued 2025-10-24 — PDF (3 pages)