Expressing support for local law enforcement officers.

Bill Number

H.Con.Res. 30

Origin Chamber

House

Congress

119th Congress, Session 1

Policy Area

Crime and Law Enforcement

Status

Passed House

Latest Action

2025-05-20: Star Print ordered on the referred concurrent resolution.

Last Updated

2026-07-10T15:13:23Z

AI-Generated Summary

Purpose

This concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 30) aims to express Congress's official support, appreciation, and gratitude for local law enforcement officers. It highlights their role in protecting communities and encourages stronger relationships between police and the public. As a non-binding resolution, it serves as a symbolic gesture rather than enforceable law.

Key Provisions

• Recognition of Service: Acknowledges the dedication of local law enforcement officers in upholding the rule of law, fighting crime, removing drugs from streets, and protecting public safety, often at great personal risk.
• Oath and Trust: Notes that officers swear to maintain public trust and respect the rights of all Americans.
• Community Relationship: Emphasizes the importance of mutual respect and collaboration between law enforcement and communities to build dialogue and enhance safety.
• Appreciation for Sacrifices: Extends thanks to officers and their families for their commitment, honors those who died in the line of duty, and encourages ongoing partnerships to improve trust and public safety.

The resolution was passed by the House on May 13, 2025, and referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on May 14, 2025.

Significant Changes to Existing Law

None. This is a concurrent resolution, which does not create, amend, or repeal any laws. It is a formal expression of congressional sentiment without legal force.

Potential Impacts

• On Government Agencies: May foster a positive atmosphere for local law enforcement agencies by signaling federal support, potentially aiding in morale or resource advocacy, though it imposes no new requirements or funding.
• On Citizens: Could promote greater public appreciation for police work, encouraging community engagement and trust-building efforts at the local level.
• On International Relations: No direct impact, as it focuses solely on domestic local law enforcement.

Overall, the effects are largely symbolic, influencing public perception and discourse on policing rather than creating tangible changes.

Main Stakeholders Affected

• Local Law Enforcement Officers and Families: Primary beneficiaries, receiving formal recognition of their risks and sacrifices.
• Communities Served: Indirectly affected through encouragement of collaborative relationships that could improve safety and dialogue.
• Congress and Federal Government: Positions lawmakers as supporters of law enforcement, potentially shaping future policy discussions.

Notable Legal, Constitutional, or Political Implications

• Legal: No binding effects; it does not alter statutes, budgets, or enforcement powers. (A concurrent resolution is a type of congressional action that expresses opinions but requires agreement from both the House and Senate without presidential approval.)
• Constitutional: Aligns with Congress's broad authority to express views on national issues under Article I, but it raises no constitutional challenges.
• Political: Serves as a bipartisan (or at least supportive) statement backing law enforcement amid ongoing debates on policing reforms, potentially influencing public opinion or electoral narratives without committing to specific actions. It underscores themes of public safety and officer valor in a politically charged environment.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Refer to the official source document for the authoritative text.

Sponsor

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

Cosponsors (35)

Rep. Nehls, Troy E. [R-TX-22], Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11], Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24], Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14], Rep. Owens, Burgess [R-UT-4], Rep. Huizenga, Bill [R-MI-4], Rep. Rogers, Mike D. [R-AL-3], Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large], Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2], Del. Radewagen, Aumua Amata Coleman [R-AS-At Large], Rep. Kelly, Trent [R-MS-1], Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1], Rep. Houchin, Erin [R-IN-9], Rep. Moore, Tim [R-NC-14], Rep. Kustoff, David [R-TN-8], Rep. Moolenaar, John R. [R-MI-2], Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8], Rep. Collins, Mike [R-GA-10], Rep. Walberg, Tim [R-MI-5], Rep. Kiggans, Jennifer A. [R-VA-2], Rep. Riley, Josh [D-NY-19], Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25], Rep. McGuire, John J. [R-VA-5], Rep. Reschenthaler, Guy [R-PA-14], Rep. Shreve, Jefferson [R-IN-6], Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48], Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-5], Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-41], Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17], Rep. Craig, Angie [D-MN-2], Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2], Rep. Kelly, Mike [R-PA-16], Rep. Nunn, Zachary [R-IA-3], Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6], Rep. Perez, Marie Gluesenkamp [D-WA-3]

Recent Actions

• 2025-05-20: Star Print ordered on the referred concurrent resolution.
• 2025-05-14: Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
• 2025-05-13: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
• 2025-05-13: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 411 - 1 (Roll no. 123). (text: CR H1961-1962) (Roll call 123)
• 2025-05-13: Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 411 - 1 (Roll no. 123). (text: CR H1961-1962) (Roll call 123)
• 2025-05-13: Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1985-1986)
• 2025-05-13: At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
• 2025-05-13: DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Con. Res. 30.
• 2025-05-13: Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1961-1965)
• 2025-05-13: Mr. Jordan moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
• 2025-05-06: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
• 2025-05-06: Submitted in House
• 2025-05-06: Submitted in House

Bill Versions

• Expressing support for local law enforcement officers. — issued 2025-05-13 — PDF (4 pages)
• Expressing support for local law enforcement officers. — issued 2025-05-06 — PDF (2 pages)
• Expressing support for local law enforcement officers. — issued 2025-05-14 — PDF (3 pages)